ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
The Segmentation of Multiple Types of Uterine Lesions in Magnetic Resonance Images Using a Sequential Deep Learning Method with Image-Level Annotations.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Obstetric and Gynecological MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- Enhancing clinical decision-making in endometrial cancer through deep learning technology: A review of current research.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fully supervised medical image segmentation methods use pixel-level labels to achieve good results, but obtaining such large-scale, high-quality labels is cumbersome and time consuming. This study aimed to develop a weakly supervised model that only used image-level labels to achieve automatic segmentation of four types of uterine lesions and three types of normal tissues on magnetic resonance images. The MRI data of the patients were retrospectively collected from the database of our institution, and the T2-weighted sequence images were selected and only image-level annotations were made. The proposed two-stage model can be divided into four sequential parts: the pixel correlation module, the class re-activation map module, the inter-pixel relation network module, and the Deeplab v3 + module. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the Hausdorff distance (HD), and the average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) were employed to evaluate the performance of the model. The original dataset consisted of 85,730 images from 316 patients with four different types of lesions (i.e., endometrial cancer, uterine leiomyoma, endometrial polyps, and atypical hyperplasia of endometrium). A total number of 196, 57, and 63 patients were randomly selected for model training, validation, and testing. After being trained from scratch, the proposed model showed a good segmentation performance with an average DSC of 83.5%, HD of 29.3 mm, and ASSD of 8.83 mm, respectively. As far as the weakly supervised methods using only image-level labels are concerned, the performance of the proposed model is equivalent to the state-of-the-art weakly supervised methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.