Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38343254›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Development of End-to-End AI-Based MRI Image Analysis System for Predicting IDH Mutation Status of Patients with Gliomas: Multicentric Validation.

João Santinha, Vasileios Katsaros, George Stranjalis, Evangelia Liouta, Christos Boskos, Celso Matos, Catarina Viegas, Nickolas Papanikolaou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

João SantinhaComputational Clinical Imaging Group, Champalimaud Research , Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal. joao.santinha@research.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8174-2943
Vasileios KatsarosDepartment of Radiology, General Anti-Cancer and Oncological Hospital of Athens, St. Savvas, Athens, Greece.
George StranjalisDepartment of Neurosurgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Evangelia LioutaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Christos BoskosAthens Microneurosurgery Laboratory, Athens, Greece.
Celso MatosRadiology Department, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal.
Catarina Viegas *Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.
Nickolas Papanikolaou *Computational Clinical Imaging Group, Champalimaud Research , Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal.
Champalimaud Foundation · PTNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRHospital Garcia de Orta · PTSenologic Hellenic Society · GRSt Savas Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiogenomics has shown potential to predict genomic phenotypes from medical images. The development of models using standard-of-care pre-operative MRI images, as opposed to advanced MRI images, enables a broader reach of such models. In this work, a radiogenomics model for IDH mutation status prediction from standard-of-care MRIs in patients with glioma was developed and validated using multicentric data. A cohort of 142 (wild-type: 32.4%) patients with glioma retrieved from the TCIA/TCGA was used to train a logistic regression model to predict the IDH mutation status. The model was evaluated using retrospective data collected in two distinct hospitals, comprising 36 (wild-type: 63.9%) and 53 (wild-type: 75.5%) patients. Model development utilized ROC analysis. Model discrimination and calibration were used for validation. The model yielded an AUC of 0.741 vs. 0.716 vs. 0.938, a sensitivity of 0.784 vs. 0.739 vs. 0.875, and a specificity of 0.657 vs. 0.692 vs. 1.000 on the training, test cohort 1, and test cohort 2, respectively. The assessment of model fairness suggested an unbiased model for age and sex, and calibration tests showed a p < 0.05. These results indicate that the developed model allows the prediction of the IDH mutation status in gliomas using standard-of-care MRI images and does not appear to hold sex and age biases.

Indexed as

AIGliomaIDH mutation statusRadiogenomics

Identifiers

PMID38343254
PMCPMC10976937
OpenAlexW4390826456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.