Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38343240›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

An Automated Decision Support System to Analyze Malignancy Patterns of Breast Masses Employing Medically Relevant Features of Ultrasound Images.

Sami Azam, Sidratul Montaha, Mohaimenul Azam Khan Raiaan, A K M Rakibul Haque Rafid, Saddam Hossain Mukta, Mirjam Jonkman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sami AzamFaculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, 0909, Australia. sami.azam@cdu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7572-9750
Sidratul MontahaFaculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, 0909, Australia.
Mohaimenul Azam Khan RaiaanFaculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, 0909, Australia.
A K M Rakibul Haque RafidFaculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, 0909, Australia.
Saddam Hossain MuktaDepartment of CSE, United International University, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Mirjam JonkmanFaculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, 0909, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An automated computer-aided approach might aid radiologists in diagnosing breast cancer at a primary stage. This study proposes a novel decision support system to classify breast tumors into benign and malignant based on clinically important features, using ultrasound images. Nine handcrafted features, which align with the clinical markers used by radiologists, are extracted from the region of interest (ROI) of ultrasound images. To validate that these elected clinical markers have a significant impact on predicting the benign and malignant classes, ten machine learning (ML) models are experimented with resulting in test accuracies in the range of 96 to 99%. In addition, four feature selection techniques are explored where two features are eliminated according to the feature ranking score of each feature selection method. The Random Forest classifier is trained with the resultant four feature sets. Results indicate that even when eliminating only two features, the performance of the model is reduced for each feature selection technique. These experiments validate the efficiency and effectiveness of the clinically important features. To develop the decision support system, a probability density function (PDF) graph is generated for each feature in order to find a threshold range to distinguish benign and malignant tumors. Based on the threshold range of particular features, a decision support system is developed in such a way that if at least eight out of nine features are within the threshold range, the image will be denoted as true predicted. With this algorithm, a test accuracy of 99.38% and an F1 Score of 99.05% is achieved, which means that our decision support system outperforms all the previously trained ML models. Moreover, after calculating individual class-based test accuracies, for the benign class, a test accuracy of 99.31% has been attained where only three benign instances are misclassified out of 437 instances, and for the malignant class, a test accuracy of 99.52% has been attained where only one malignant instance is misclassified out of 210 instances. This system is robust, time-effective, and reliable as the radiologists' criteria are followed and may aid specialists in making a diagnosis.

Indexed as

Breast cancerClinical featuresDecision support systemMachine learningMalignancy patterns

Identifiers

PMID38343240
PMCPMC10976927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.