Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38343237›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Natural Language Processing Algorithm Used for Staging Pulmonary Oncology from Free-Text Radiological Reports: "Including PET-CT and Validation Towards Clinical Use".

J Martijn Nobel, Sander Puts, Jasenko Krdzalic, Karen M L Zegers, Marc B I Lobbes, Simon G F Robben, André L A J Dekker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Uncertainty-aware automatic TNM staging classification for [BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J Martijn Nobel *Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands. martijn.nobel@mumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-7290
Sander Puts *Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, Netherlands.
Jasenko KrdzalicZuyderland Medical Center, Department of Medical Imaging, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands.
Karen M L ZegersDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, Netherlands.
Marc B I LobbesDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Simon G F RobbenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands.
André L A J DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLUniversity Medical Center · USMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP) can be used to process and structure free text, such as (free text) radiological reports. In radiology, it is important that reports are complete and accurate for clinical staging of, for instance, pulmonary oncology. A computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT scan is of great importance in tumor staging, and NLP may be of additional value to the radiological report when used in the staging process as it may be able to extract the T and N stage of the 8th tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new TN algorithm (TN-PET-CT) by adding a layer of metabolic activity to an already existing rule-based NLP algorithm (TN-CT). This new TN-PET-CT algorithm is capable of staging chest CT examinations as well as PET-CT scans. The study design made it possible to perform a subgroup analysis to test the external validation of the prior TN-CT algorithm. For information extraction and matching, pyContextNLP, SpaCy, and regular expressions were used. Overall TN accuracy score of the TN-PET-CT algorithm was 0.73 and 0.62 in the training and validation set (N = 63, N = 100). The external validation of the TN-CT classifier (N = 65) was 0.72. Overall, it is possible to adjust the TN-CT algorithm into a TN-PET-CT algorithm. However, outcomes highly depend on the accuracy of the report, the used vocabulary, and its context to express, for example, uncertainty. This is true for both the adjusted PET-CT algorithm and for the CT algorithm when applied in another hospital.

Indexed as

Classification systemFree textMachine learningNatural language processingRadiologyReporting

Identifiers

PMID38343237
PMCPMC10976919
OpenAlexW4390788550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.