ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
Can Digital Enhancement Restore the Image Quality of Phosphor Plate-Based Radiographs Partially Damaged by Ambient Light?
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoral digital radiography: A comprehensive report on the technical specifications of current and historical systems.Imaging science in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To assess the effect of digital enhancement on the image quality of radiographs obtained with photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates partially damaged by ambient light. Radiographs of an aluminum step wedge were obtained using the VistaScan and Express systems. Half of the PSP plates was exposed to ambient light for 0, 10, 30, 60, or 90 s before being scanned. The resulting radiographs were exported with and without digital enhancement. Metrics for brightness, contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were derived, and the ratio of each metric between the exposed-to-light and non-exposed-to-light halves of the radiographs was calculated. The resulting ratios of the radiographs with digital enhancement were subtracted from those without digital enhancement and compared among each other. For the VistaScan system, digital enhancement partially restored brightness, contrast, and CNR. For the Express system, digital enhancement only restored CNR and not the impact of ambient light on brightness and contrast. Specifically, digital enhancement restored 23.48% of brightness for the VistaScan, while percentages below 1% were observed for the Express. Digital enhancement restored 53.25% of image contrast for the VistaScan and 5.79% for the Express; 40.71% of CNR was restored for the VistaScan, and 35% for the Express. Digital enhancement can partially restore the damage caused by ambient light on the brightness and contrast of PSP-based radiographs obtained with the VistaScan, as well as on CNR for the VistaScan and Express systems. The exposure of PSP plates to light can lead to unnecessary retakes and increased patient exposure to X-rays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.