ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
Fetal Ultrasound Segmentation and Measurements Using Appearance and Shape Prior Based Density Regression with Deep CNN and Robust Ellipse Fitting.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurement-Oriented Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Automated Fetal Head Biometry in Prenatal Ultrasound.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Application of snake model imaging selection and analysis to the ultrasound diagnosis of white matter damage in preterm infants.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Prospective Applications of Artificial Intelligence In Fetal Medicine: A Scoping Review of Recent Updates.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
- Advancements in Artificial Intelligence for Fetal Neurosonography: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately segmenting the structure of the fetal head (FH) and performing biometry measurements, including head circumference (HC) estimation, stands as a vital requirement for addressing abnormal fetal growth during pregnancy under the expertise of experienced radiologists using ultrasound (US) images. However, accurate segmentation and measurement is a challenging task due to image artifact, incomplete ellipse fitting, and fluctuations due to FH dimensions over different trimesters. Also, it is highly time-consuming due to the absence of specialized features, which leads to low segmentation accuracy. To address these challenging tasks, we propose an automatic density regression approach to incorporate appearance and shape priors into the deep learning-based network model (DR-ASPnet) with robust ellipse fitting using fetal US images. Initially, we employed multiple pre-processing steps to remove unwanted distortions, variable fluctuations, and a clear view of significant features from the US images. Then some form of augmentation operation is applied to increase the diversity of the dataset. Next, we proposed the hierarchical density regression deep convolutional neural network (HDR-DCNN) model, which involves three network models to determine the complex location of FH for accurate segmentation during the training and testing processes. Then, we used post-processing operations using contrast enhancement filtering with a morphological operation model to smooth the region and remove unnecessary artifacts from the segmentation results. After post-processing, we applied the smoothed segmented result to the robust ellipse fitting-based least square (REFLS) method for HC estimation. Experimental results of the DR-ASPnet model obtain 98.86% dice similarity coefficient (DSC) as segmentation accuracy, and it also obtains 1.67 mm absolute distance (AD) as measurement accuracy compared to other state-of-the-art methods. Finally, we achieved a 0.99 correlation coefficient (CC) in estimating the measured and predicted HC values on the HC18 dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.