ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
Pulmonary Nodule Classification Using a Multiview Residual Selective Kernel Network.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Expert Committee-Driven Adaptive Framework for Multicenter Pulmonary Nodule Classification Using AI-Derived Quantitative CT Features.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Graphicalized vision-language modeling for comprehensive lung nodule analysis and risk stratification.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Multi-view attention-based deep learning for benign-malignant classification of pulmonary nodules.PloS one · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and early detection is crucial to reduce the mortality. A reliable computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system can help facilitate early detection of malignant nodules. Although existing methods provide adequate classification accuracy, there is still room for further improvement. This study is dedicated to investigating a new CAD scheme for predicting the malignant likelihood of lung nodules in computed tomography (CT) images in light of a deep learning strategy. Conceived from the residual learning and selective kernel, we investigated an efficient residual selective kernel (RSK) block to handle the diversity of lung nodules with various shapes and obscure structures. Founded on this RSK block, we established a multiview RSK network (MRSKNet), to which three anatomical planes in the axial, coronal, and sagittal directions were fed. To reinforce the classification efficiency, seven handcrafted texture features with a filter-like computation strategy were explored, among which the homogeneity (HOM) feature maps are combined with the corresponding intensity CT images for concatenation input, leading to an improved network architecture. Evaluated on the public benchmark Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative (LIDC-IDRI) challenge database with ten-fold cross validation of binary classification, our experimental results indicated high area under receiver operating characteristic (AUC) and accuracy scores. A better compromise between recall and specificity was struck using the suggested concatenation strategy comparing to many state-of-the-art approaches. The proposed pulmonary nodule classification framework exhibited great efficacy and achieved a higher AUC of 0.9711. The association of handcrafted texture features with deep learning models is promising in advancing the classification performance. The developed pulmonary nodule CAD network architecture is of potential in facilitating the diagnosis of lung cancer for further image processing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.