Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38343218›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Machine Learning-Based Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Model for Preoperative Predicting the Deep Stromal Invasion in Patients with Early Cervical Cancer.

Haowen Yan, Gaoting Huang, Zhihe Yang, Yirong Chen, Zhiming Xiang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inhibiting SNX10 induces autophagy to suppress invasion and EMT and inhibits the PI3K/AKT pathway in cervical cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haowen YanThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 510632, Guangzhou, China.
Gaoting HuangDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, 510095, Guangzhou, China.
Zhihe YangDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, 511400, Guangzhou, China.
Yirong ChenDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, 511400, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiming XiangDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, 511400, Guangzhou, China. xiangzhiming@pyhospital.com.cn.
Panyu District Central Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171931the Panyu Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 2019-Z04-01the Panyu Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 2019-Z04-23the Panyu Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 2022-Z04-013the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 201903010032the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 202102080572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep stromal invasion is an important pathological factor associated with the treatments and prognosis of cervical cancer patients. Accurate determination of deep stromal invasion before radical hysterectomy (RH) is of great value for early clinical treatment decision-making and improving the prognosis of these patients. Machine learning is gradually applied in the construction of clinical models to improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis or prediction, but whether machine learning can improve the preoperative diagnosis accuracy of deep stromal invasion in patients with cervical cancer was still unclear. This cross-sectional study was to construct three preoperative diagnostic models for deep stromal invasion in patients with early cervical cancer based on clinical, radiomics, and clinical combined radiomics data using the machine learning method. We enrolled 229 patients with early cervical cancer receiving RH combined with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and the fivefold cross-validation were applied to screen out radiomics features. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to identify clinical predictors. All subjects were divided into the training set (n = 160) and testing set (n = 69) at a ratio of 7:3. Three light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) models were constructed in the training set and verified in the testing set. The radiomics features were statistically different between deep stromal invasion < 1/3 group and deep stromal invasion ≥ 1/3 group. In the training set, the area under the curve (AUC) of the prediction model based on radiomics features was 0.951 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.922-0.980), the AUC of the prediction model based on clinical predictors was 0.769 (95% CI 0.703-0.835), and the AUC of the prediction model based on radiomics features and clinical predictors was 0.969 (95% CI 0.947-0.990). The AUC of the prediction model based on radiomics features and clinical predictors was 0.914 (95% CI 0.848-0.980) in the testing set. The prediction model for deep stromal invasion in patients with early cervical cancer based on clinical and radiomics data exhibited good predictive performance with an AUC of 0.969, which might help the clinicians early identify patients with high risk of deep stromal invasion and provide timely interventions.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerDeep stromal invasionMRIRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID38343218
PMCPMC11266323
OpenAlexW4390709167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.