Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38343210›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Deconvolution-Based Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Improve the Prediction of Pathological Information of Breast Cancer.

Liangliang Zhang, Ming Fan, Lihua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liangliang ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Ming FanInstitute of Intelligent Biomedicine, School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, China. ming.fan@hdu.edu.cn.
Lihua LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, China. lilh@hdu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFE0203700National Natural Science Foundation of China 61731008National Natural Science Foundation of China 61871428National Natural Science Foundation of China U1809205,and 62302014Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China LJ19H180001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, revealing changes in the tumor microenvironment, are related to the pathological information of breast cancer. Tracer kinetic models (e.g., Tofts-Kety model) with a nonlinear least square solver are commonly used to estimate PK parameters. However, the method is sensitive to noise in images. To relieve the effects of noise, a deconvolution (DEC) method, which was validated on synthetic concentration-time series, was proposed to accurately calculate PK parameters from breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. A time-to-peak-based tumor partitioning method was used to divide the whole tumor into three tumor subregions with different kinetic patterns. Radiomic features were calculated from the tumor subregion and whole tumor-based PK parameter maps. The optimal features determined by the fivefold cross-validation method were used to build random forest classifiers to predict molecular subtypes, Ki-67, and tumor grade. The diagnostic performance evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was compared between the subregion and whole tumor-based PK parameters. The results showed that the DEC method obtained more accurate PK parameters than the Tofts method. Moreover, the results showed that the subregion-based K

Indexed as

DeconvolutionDynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingPharmacokinetic parametersTracer kinetic modelsTumor subregions

Identifiers

PMID38343210
PMCPMC10976965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.