ArticleCJEM2024
Impact of virtual care on planned rechecks in a pediatric emergency department: a quality improvement project.
Article in CJEM, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the absence of accessible urgent follow-up options, emergency physicians may use an in-person recheck (planned return visit) to the Emergency Department (ED) as a safety net for discharged patients. In-person rechecks require travel, triage, and waiting time for patients and families and contribute to ED census. Many of these visits do not result in further investigation or changes in management but can provide reassurance for the family and care providers. We aimed to reduce the volume of in-person rechecks to our ED through an urgent virtual follow-up process.
methodsWe conducted a quality improvement project using iterative process mapping and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to develop and implement a new model of care for virtual rechecks. An interdisciplinary team tested and refined the virtual care process from December 2020 to June 2022. Outcome, process and balancing measures were tracked continuously and analyzed using statistical process control.
resultsBaseline data revealed that the majority of in-person rechecks were for young infants with bronchiolitis. Post-implementation of the new process, 50% of all virtual rechecks were for respiratory illnesses. Use of virtual rechecks increased steadily to an average of 6.5 per 1000 ED visits with 58% of all rechecks now completed virtually. The number of in-person rechecks did not decrease during the study period. Virtual rechecks triggered an in-person ED visit in 5.2% of virtual recheck instances. There was no increase in unplanned return ED visits or admissions after implementation of virtual rechecks.
conclusionVirtual rechecks can be safely implemented to allow urgent reassessment of patients following an ED visit. Virtual rechecks could be a useful tool for addressing planned reassessments in the pediatric ED, especially during surges of respiratory illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38342856What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.