Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38342806›Full record

ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2024

Noninvasive and Invasive Study of the Pumping Function of Rat Heart in Myocardial Infarction.

A A Abramov, A V Prosvirnin, V L Lakomkin, V I Kapelko

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A A AbramovE. I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. ferk_88@list.ru.
A V ProsvirninE. I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
V L LakomkinE. I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
V I KapelkoE. I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cardiohemodynamics was studied 2 and 4 weeks after myocardial infarction modeling in Wistar rats. We compared the data obtained by echocardiography (echoCG) and catheterization of the left ventricle. The myocardial infarction was modeled by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. EchoCG and the left ventricle catheterization were performed before and after myocardial infarction modeling. Similar results were obtained by both methods, namely the left ventricle dilatation, bradycardia, a reduced ejection fraction and delayed relaxation. According to echoCG, the end-diastolic left ventricle volume increased by 2 times, and initial diastolic left ventricle volume - by more than 5 times. The left ventricle catheterization showed lower rise, by 32 and 69%, respectively. The overestimated volume of the left ventricle in myocardial infarction according to echoCG data in comparison with catheterization can be explained by changes in the geometry of the ventricle (bulging of a part of the ventricular wall).

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionVentricular Dysfunction, LeftAnimalsEchocardiographyHeart VentriclesRatsRats, WistarVentricular Function, LeftEchoCGejection fractionheart catheterizationmyocardial infarctionpressure-volume

Identifiers

PMID38342806
OpenAlexW4391885935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.