Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38342800›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Reasons why it is time to change imaging guidelines on endometriosis.

Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Pascal Rousset, Cyril Touboul, Leo Razakamanantsoa, Lucia Manganaro

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabelle Thomassin-NaggaraDepartment of Radiology Imaging and Interventional Radiology (IRIS), Service IRIS, Tenon Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France. Isabelle.thomassin@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-0133
Pascal RoussetHospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Cyril TouboulSaint-Antoine Research Cancer Center, Sorbonne University, INSERM UMR S 938, 75012, Paris, France.
Leo RazakamanantsoaDepartment of Radiology Imaging and Interventional Radiology (IRIS), Service IRIS, Tenon Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France.
Lucia ManganaroDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, University Spienza, Rome, Italia.
Inserm · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In light of the rising number of patients referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to suspected endometriosis and the high expectations of these patients, there is a need for new imaging guidelines to optimally protocol and indicate MRI and transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) examinations. This is crucial for accurately addressing the inquiries of gynecologists, encompassing complete mapping and preoperative staging, and facilitating effective communication with patients. In this context, the development of a standardized lexicon, as well as dedicated imaging classifications, is recommended to aid in the comprehensive management of patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The radiologist should use a standardized lexicon and provide a score along with details about the specific compartments affected by endometriosis disease. This helps in offering clearer guidance to the surgeon. KEY POINTS: • An optimal staging is based on the combination of clinical examination, transvaginal US, and MRI. • MRI is able to detect location that is hidden at the beginning of a laparoscopic surgery and thus the need for dedicated MR classifications to correctly stage the disease. • Deep pelvic endometriosis index (dPEI) classification is externally validated and highly correlated with operating time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

Indexed as

EndometriosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographyFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicClassificationEndometriosisMRUS

Identifiers

PMID38342800
OpenAlexW4391885896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.