Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38342785›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2024

Impact of multiple treatment cycles with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies on migraine course: focus on discontinuation periods. Insights from the multicenter, prospective, I-GRAINE study.

Piero Barbanti, Cinzia Aurilia, Gabriella Egeo, Stefania Proietti, Paola Torelli, Florindo d'Onofrio, Antonio Carnevale, Sofia Tavani, Bianca Orlando, Giulia Fiorentini and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cost-efficacy evaluation of a mindfulness-based program added to treatment as usual for the treatment of chronic migraine associated to medication overuse headache.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Piero Barbanti *Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via Della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy. piero.barbanti@sanraffaele.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5670-3755
Cinzia Aurilia *Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via Della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy.
Gabriella EgeoHeadache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via Della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy.
Stefania ProiettiClinical and Molecular Epidemiology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy.
Paola TorelliUnit of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Headache Center, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Florindo d'OnofrioHeadache Center Neurology Unit, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy.
Antonio CarnevaleHeadache Center San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Sofia TavaniCatholic University of Sacred Heart Rome, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Bianca OrlandoHeadache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via Della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy.
Giulia FiorentiniHeadache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via Della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy.
Bruno ColomboHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Scientific Institute San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FilippiHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Scientific Institute San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Stefano BonassiSan Raffaele University, Rome, Italy.
Sabina CevoliIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Italian Migraine Registry (I-GRAINE) study group
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITSan Raffaele University of Rome · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITOspedale San Filippo Neri · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhile a single 12-month treatment cycle (TrC) with anti-CGRP mAbs is not disease-modifying for most patients, there is limited understanding of the effects of multiple TrCs on migraine course. We evaluated whether a second TrC might modify the migraine course by comparing the occurrence of migraine relapse after discontinuation of the second TrC to that following the cessation of the first TrC.

methodsIn a real-life, multicenter, prospective study we considered all consecutive patients diagnosed with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM) with > 3 treatment failures and treated with any anti-CGRP mAbs for ≥ 2 consecutive 12-month TrCs who were responders at week 12. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days (MMD) for HFEM or monthly headache days (MHD) for CM at the first month of treatment discontinuation after the second TrC (D2) compared to the first TrC (D1). Secondary endpoints included variations in monthly analgesic medications (MAM), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) scores, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% response rates, and relapse from episodic migraine to CM and from no-medication overuse (MO) to MO at D2 vs. D1.

resultsOne-hundred-seventy-eight patients completed two 12-month TrCs with anti-CGRP mAbs. At D2, patients experienced a significant reduction in MMD (- 0.6, p = 0.028), MHD (- 2.6, p < 0.001), monthly analgesic medications (- 2.0, p < 0.001), and HIT-6 score (- 2.2, p < 0.001) compared to D1, indicating improved effectiveness. The ≥ 50% response rate at weeks 45-48 during the first TrC was 95.5%, while at weeks 45-48 of the second TrC was 99.4%. Corresponding rates at D1 was 20.2% whereas at D2 was 51.6% (p < 0.0001). No statistical difference emerged in ≥ 75% and 100% responders. The relapse rate from episodic migraine to CM at D2 was lower than at D1 (12.3% vs 30.4%; p = 0.0002) Fewer patients experienced relapse from no-MO to MO at D2 compared to D1 (29.5% vs 68.7%; p = 0.00001). DISCUSSION: A second TrC with anti-CGRP mAbs demonstrated clinical improvements compared to the first one, as indicated by a milder migraine relapse at D2 compared to D1. Multiple TrCs with anti-CGRP mAbs could progressively modify migraine evolution by reducing CGRP-dependent neuroinflammatory nociceptive inputs to the brain.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalMigraine DisordersAdultCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideAnti-CGRP mAbsDiscontinuationDisease-modifierMigraineMultiple treatmentsTreatment

Identifiers

PMID38342785
PMCPMC11055727
OpenAlexW4391751151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.