Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38342784›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024

Three-stage transfer learning for motor imagery EEG recognition.

Junhao Li, Qingshan She, Ming Meng, Shengzhi Du, Yingchun Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junhao LiSchool of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China.
Qingshan SheSchool of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China. qsshe@hdu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-9833
Ming MengSchool of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China.
Shengzhi DuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Yingchun ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62271181National Natural Science Foundation of China 62371172Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LZ22F010003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) paradigms have been widely used in neural rehabilitation and drowsiness state assessment. The progress in brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has emphasized the importance of accurately and efficiently detecting motor imagery intentions from electroencephalogram (EEG). Despite the recent breakthroughs made in developing EEG-based algorithms for decoding MI, the accuracy and efficiency of these models remain limited by technical challenges posed by cross-subject heterogeneity in EEG data processing and the scarcity of EEG data for training. Inspired by the optimal transport theory, this study aims to develop a novel three-stage transfer learning (TSTL) method, which uses the existing labeled data from a source domain to improve classification performance on an unlabeled target domain. Notably, the proposed method comprises three components, namely, the Riemannian tangent space mapping (RTSM), source domain transformer (SDT), and optimal subspace mapping (OSM). The RTSM maps a symmetric positive definite matrix from the Riemannian space to the tangent space to minimize the marginal probability distribution drift. The SDT transforms the source domain to a target domain by finding the optimal transport mapping matrix to reduce the joint probability distribution differences. The OSM finally maps the transformed source domain and original target domain to the same subspace to further mitigate the distribution discrepancy. The performance of the proposed method was validated on two public BCI datasets, and the average accuracy of the algorithm on two datasets was 72.24% and 69.29%. Our results demonstrated the improved performance of EEG-based MI detection in comparison with state-of-the-art algorithms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyHumansImaginationMachine LearningSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBrain-computer interface (BCI)Motor imagery (MI)Optimal transport (OT)Transfer learning (TL)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.