ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2024
The optimal cut-off value of five-time chair stand test for assessing sarcopenia among Chinese community-dwelling older adults.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Enhancing sarcopenia screening in primary care: a machine learning approach using simple physical tests vs. SARC-F in 2,788 community-dwelling older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Preliminary Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise (CORE) Clinical Workflow Algorithm on Health Outcomes During Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer Care.International journal of breast cancer · 2026Article
- Equation-derived SMI not generalizable for DXA-defined low muscle mass in Chinese adults: external validation study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Sarcopenia in glioblastoma: the imaging we need and what it tells us.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024Article
- The optimal cut-off value of five-time chair stand test for assessing sarcopenia among Chinese community-dwelling older adults.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model assessing the risk of sarcopenia in rheumatoid arthritis patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe five-time chair stand test (5CST) as an indicator of muscle strength and physical function is the first step in assessing sarcopenia. We aimed to determine the optimal cut-off value of the 5CST for assessing older adults with sarcopenia in the Chinese community.
methodsWe used a stratified cluster random sampling method to recruit older adults from Chinese communities. The handgrip strength was assessed using an electronic handgrip dynamometer. The 5CST and gait speed were assessed by the trained researchers. The bioimpedance analysis device was used to evaluate the skeletal muscle index. We used the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia diagnosis criteria as the gold standard. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, we determine the optimal cut-off value using the Youden index.
resultsA total of 1027 participants were included in this analysis, including 337 men and 690 women with an average age of 70.35 ± 7.24 years. The prevalence of sarcopenia in total participants was 24.9%. The optimal cut-off value of 5CST in the total population was 10.9 s. Stratified by age and gender, for the older adults aged 60-69 years, the optimal cut-off values were 9.2 s in men and 10.8 s in women; for the older adults aged 70-79 years, cut-off values were 10.2 s in men and 10.9 s in women; and for the older adults over 80 years, cut-off values were 14.0 s in men and 11.5 s in women (all P < 0.001). The areas under the curve of 5CST were 0.632 in men and 0.650 in women (both P < 0.001). Using the newly defined cut-off values, the prevalence of sarcopenia increased significantly (P < 0.001).
conclusionsWe determined the optimal cut-off value of the 5CST for assessing older adults with sarcopenia in the Chinese community, and this cut-off can significantly improve the detection rate of sarcopenia. The cut-off determined in our study will help community workers detect more people with sarcopenia and benefit from early intervention and management of sarcopenia in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.