ArticleJournal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society2024
Pancreatic enzyme prescription following ivacaftor licensing: A retrospective analysis of the US and UK cystic fibrosis registries.
Article in Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Modulators in Cystic Fibrosis: A Review of Registry-Based Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- New drugs, new challenges in cystic fibrosis care.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRelieving gastrointestinal symptoms is a research priority in cystic fibrosis. Emerging evidence highlights effects of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators on gastrointestinal function, including pancreatic sufficiency. This study explores ivacaftor licensing and treatment on recorded pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) prescription in the US and UK CF registries.
methodsRetrospective longitudinal registry study of recorded pancreatic PERT use between 2008 and 2017. Interrupted time series analysis in propensity-matched cohorts estimated annual change and step change according to ivacaftor eligibility before and after licensing year, 2012. Generalised estimating equations assessed adjusted risk of PERT use in individuals treated with ivacaftor after 2012 compared to untreated individuals.
resultsIn the US CF registry, the difference in annual change in prevalence of PERT use post-2012 between eligible cases and ineligible controls was -5.0 per 1000 people/year (95 %CI -7.6; -2.3, p = 0.001). The step change and annual change in prevalence of PERT use in eligible cases was not significantly different to controls in the UK CF registry. Relative to the relationship in 2013, ivacaftor treatment in the US CF registry was associated with a lower adjusted risk ratio of PERT use compared to untreated individuals by 2016 (0.97, 95 %CI 0.96; 0.99), which was not observed in the UK CF registry.
conclusionsLicensing of ivacaftor was followed by a lower prevalence of PERT use in the eligible US population compared to pre-licensing period, as well as lower risk of PERT use in those who received treatment. Inconsistencies in US and UK CF registries were observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.