Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38342215›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2024

Global geodiversity components are not equally represented in UNESCO Global Geoparks.

Emma M N Polman, Arie C Seijmonsbergen, Hannes Versteegh, W Daniel Kissling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Geodiversity for science and society.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Global geodiversity components are not equally represented in UNESCO Global Geoparks.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Geodiversity in the Amazon drainage basin.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma M N PolmanInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-5362-8292
Arie C SeijmonsbergenInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7454-7637
Hannes VersteeghInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W Daniel KisslingInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7274-6755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGs) is to protect globally significant geoheritage and geodiversity, but quantitative evidence on the global representativeness of geodiversity components (i.e. geology, soils, geomorphology and hydrology) in these geoparks is in short supply. Here, we provide a first assessment by deriving a global map of geodiversity to test whether the presence of geodiversity components in UGGs is representative for the global availability and distribution of geodiversity. Using openly accessible global datasets and a newly developed workflow, we have calculated metrics for each geodiversity component and a global geodiversity index; we then quantified whether UGGs represent global geodiversity and then compared their components to a randomized spatial distribution of geoparks. Our results show that lithological and topographical diversity are more represented in UGGs than outside these sites, while soil type and hydrological diversity are not significantly different. Furthermore, individual soil types and lithological classes are under-represented and unevenly distributed in Asian and European UGGs. This is probably caused by the concentration of geoparks in Asian and European mountains. To better conserve geodiversity, we suggest an initiative to consider the protection and representation of all geodiversity components in their global context. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Geodiversity for science and society'.

Indexed as

geoconservationgeodiversity mappingglobal geodiversityprotected areasUNESCO Global Geoparks

Identifiers

PMID38342215
PMCPMC10859229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.