Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38342190›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pain2024

Systemic Inflammation, Sleep, and Psychological Factors Determine Recovery Trajectories for People With Neck Pain: An Exploratory Study.

Ivo J Lutke Schipholt, Michel W Coppieters, Maaike Diepens, Trynke Hoekstra, Raymond W J G Ostelo, Mary F Barbe, Onno G Meijer, Hetty J Bontkes, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ivo J Lutke SchipholtDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands.
Michel W CoppietersDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane & Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Maaike DiepensDepartment Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
Trynke HoekstraDepartment of Health Sciences and the Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands.
Raymond W J G OsteloDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands.
Mary F BarbeCenter for Translational Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Onno G MeijerDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands; Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, PR China.
Hetty J BontkesDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands.
Gwendolyne G M Scholten-PeetersDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLDepartment of Health · ZAFujian Medical University · CNGriffith University · AUMaastricht University · NLTranslational Therapeutics (United States) · USVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Biomarkers of Tissue Tolerance and Behavior in a Rat ModelR01AR056019 · NIAMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI BARBE, MARY F · 2009 to 2025
$7.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted an explorative prospective cohort study with 6 months follow-up to 1) identify different pain and disability trajectories following an episode of acute neck pain, and 2) assess whether neuroimmune/endocrine, psychological, behavioral, nociceptive processing, clinical outcome, demographic and management-related factors differ between these trajectories. Fifty people with acute neck pain (ie, within 2 weeks of onset) were included. At baseline, and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 26 weeks follow-up, various neuroimmune/endocrine (eg, inflammatory cytokines and endocrine factors), psychological (eg, stress symptoms), behavioral (eg, sleep disturbances), nociceptive processing (eg, condition pain modulation), clinical outcome (eg, trauma), demographic factors (eg, age), and management-related factors (eg, treatment received) were assessed. Latent class models were performed to identify outcome trajectories for neck pain and disability. Linear mixed models or the Pearson chi-square test were used to evaluate differences in these factors between the trajectories at baseline and at each follow-up assessment and over the entire 6 months period. For pain, 3 trajectories were identified. The majority of patients were assigned to the "Moderate pain - Favourable recovery" trajectory (n = 25; 50%) with smaller proportions assigned to the "Severe pain - Favourable recovery" (n = 16; 32%) and the "Severe pain - Unfavourable recovery" (n = 9; 18%) trajectories. For disability, 2 trajectories were identified: "Mild disability - Favourable recovery" (n = 43; 82%) and "Severe disability - Unfavourable recovery" (n = 7; 18%). Ongoing systemic inflammation (increased high-sensitive C-reactive protein), sleep disturbances, and elevated psychological factors (such as depression, stress and anxiety symptoms) were mainly present in the unfavorable outcome trajectories compared to the favorable outcome trajectories. PERSPECTIVE: Using exploratory analyses, different recovery trajectories for acute neck pain were identified based on disability and pain intensity. These trajectories were influenced by systemic inflammation, sleep disturbances, and psychological factors.

Indexed as

InflammationNeck PainSleep Wake DisordersAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionImmunologymusculoskeletalneck painrecoverysleep

Identifiers

PMID38342190
PMCPMC12006975
OpenAlexW4391693228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.