Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38342051›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2024

Prosecuting overdose: An exploratory study of prosecutorial motivations for drug-induced homicide prosecutions in North Carolina.

Brandon Morrissey, Taleed El-Sabawi, Jennifer J Carroll

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon MorrisseyNorth Carolina State University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, 10 Current Drive, Suite 334, Campus Box 8107, Raleigh, NC 27695-8107, USA. Electronic address: bjmorri5@ncsu.edu.
Taleed El-SabawiFlorida International University College of Law, 11200 SW 8th Street, Rafael Diaz Balart Hall, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Jennifer J CarrollNorth Carolina State University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, 10 Current Drive, Suite 334, Campus Box 8107, Raleigh, NC 27695-8107, USA.
North Carolina State University · USFlorida International University · US

Funding

The Influence of Public Health Infrastructure on Prosecutorial Responses to the Opioid CrisisK01DA057414 · NIDA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Taleed El-Sabawi · 2023 to 2026
$672k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA057414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProsecutorial use of drug-induced homicide (DIH) laws varies, and their public health impacts are poorly understood. This mixed-methods study explores associations between the number of DIH charges filed in North Carolina's 42 prosecutorial districts and district-level characteristics. Further, it documents the experience and views of North Carolina prosecutors on DIH cases.

methodsWe conducted a descriptive, exploratory analysis of DIH enforcement by prosecutorial district in North Carolina to assess associations between overdose deaths, number of prosecutors employed, and rurality of the district. We also sent a survey to all N.C. prosecutors requesting that they detail their experience with and views on DIH prosecutions.

resultsWe found no association between overdose deaths or the number of prosecutors and DIH charges within a district. Survey data suggests that perceived justice for the deceased and perceived imperatives to "do something" about overdose influence prosecutorial use of DIH charges. Prosecutors generally appeared to agree that DIH cases had the potential to reduce substance use and/or drug dealing and/or fentanyl dealing and/or drug overdose in their districts, though how DIH cases would produce those effects was not clarified. Many prosecutors framed people who use drugs as helpless victims and forged categorical distinctions between (1) people who use drugs and sell drugs to support their addiction and (2) people who use drugs and sell drugs and are motivated by profit. Several prosecutors suggested that charging one person with homicide for another person's consensual acts may not appear logical to all jurors.

conclusionsDIH prosecutions do not appear to be predicted by district characteristics commonly believed to shape prosecutorial action. Many prosecutors endorsed claims about the community-level impacts of DIH prosecutions that are unproven and generally contradict the available evidence. More research on the implementation and community-level outcomes of DIH prosecutions is needed.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseHomicideFentanylHumansMotivationNorth CarolinaFentanylDrug-induced homicideDrug policyOverdoseProsecutorial discretion

Identifiers

PMID38342051
PMCPMC11031346
OpenAlexW4391731505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.