ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2024
Construction and validation of a nomogram to predict left ventricular hypertrophy in low-risk patients with hypertension.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Curriculum-Based Deep Learning for Automated Segmental Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Classification Using Short-Axis Echocardiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Risk factors and a predictive model for left ventricular hypertrophy in young adults with salt-sensitive hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Article
- Construction and validation of a nomogram to predict left ventricular hypertrophy in low-risk patients with hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Electrocardiography (ECG) is an accessible diagnostic tool for screening patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). However, its diagnostic sensitivity is low, with a high probability of false-negatives. Thus, this study aimed to establish a clinically useful nomogram to supplement the assessment of LVH in patients with hypertension and without ECG-LVH based on Cornell product criteria (low-risk hypertensive population). A cross-sectional dataset was used for model construction and divided into development (n = 2906) and verification (n = 1447) datasets. A multivariable logistic regression risk model and nomogram were developed after screening for risk factors. Of the 4353 low-risk hypertensive patients, 673 (15.4%) had LVH diagnosed by echocardiography (Echo-LVH). Eleven risk factors were identified: hypertension awareness, duration of hypertension, age, sex, high waist-hip ratio, education level, tea consumption, hypochloremia, and other ECG-LVH diagnostic criteria (including Sokolow-Lyon, Sokolow-Lyon products, and Peguero-Lo Presti). For the development and validation datasets, the areas under the curve were 0.724 (sensitivity = 0.606) and 0.700 (sensitivity = 0.663), respectively. After including blood pressure, the areas under the curve were 0.735 (sensitivity = 0.734) and 0.716 (sensitivity = 0.718), respectively. This novel nomogram had a good predictive ability and may be used to assess the Echo-LVH risk in patients with hypertension and without ECG-LVH based on Cornell product criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.