Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38341601›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2024

A roadmap for sustainable implementation of vocational rehabilitation for people with mental disorders and its outcomes: a qualitative evaluation.

Yvonne Noteboom, Femke van Nassau, Astrid R Bosma, Eric J E van der Hijden, Maaike A Huysmans, Johannes R Anema

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yvonne NoteboomAmsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Room C379, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. y.noteboom@amsterdamumc.nl.
Femke van NassauAmsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Room C379, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Astrid R BosmaAmsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Room C379, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric J E van der HijdenFaculteit Der Sociale Wetenschappen, Talma Institute Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maaike A HuysmansAmsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Room C379, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes R AnemaAmsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Room C379, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople suffering from mental health disorders have lower work participation compared to people without mental challenges. To increase work participation within this group vocational rehabilitation interventions are often offered. Collaboration between the mental health care and social security sectors is needed to enable professionals to perform optimally when carrying out these interventions. Yet, regulatory and financial barriers often hinder sustainable implementation. To overcome these barriers an experimental roadmap for sustainable funding based on a shared savings strategy was piloted in four regions. The aim of the present qualitative study was to gain understanding of the uses of this roadmap and the factors that were important in the experiment's process.

methodThe roadmap consisted of five steps based upon insights from shared savings strategies and implementation science knowledge, and was initiated by a national steering board. The roadmap aimed to make sustainable funding agreements (based on shared savings) for the implementation of a vocational rehabilitation intervention. In four regions, stakeholders from the mental health care and social security services sector followed the roadmap. We conducted interviews (n = 16) with involved participants and project leaders of the experiment and collected 54 sets of field notes and documents to evaluate the roadmap process. A thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

resultsRegions perceived improved stakeholder collaboration around vocational rehabilitation after they were guided by the roadmap. Three regions made, or intended to make, agreements on collaboration and funding, yet not based on shared savings. Moreover, going through the roadmap took more time than anticipated. Stakeholder collaboration depended on factors like personal and organizational interests and collaboration conditions and values. Financial legislation and politics were regarded as barriers and personal motives were mentioned as a facilitator in this process.

conclusionsOur study showed that the roadmap supported stakeholders to establish a more sustainable collaboration, even though no sustainable financial agreements were made yet. Although participants acknowledged the function of financial insights and the need for financial resources, the driver for collaboration was found to be more on improving clients' perspectives than on solving unfair financial distribution issues. This suggests modifying the focus of the roadmap from financial benefits to improving clients' perspectives.

Indexed as

Financial implementation strategyFundingImplementationMental disordersMental health careShared savings strategySocial security sectorStakeholder collaborationVocational rehabilitationWork participation

Identifiers

PMID38341601
PMCPMC10858636
OpenAlexW4391722844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.