Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2024
Comparison of the effects of transversus thoracic muscle plane block and pecto-intercostal fascial block on postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Effects of Transversus Thoracic Muscle Plane Block vs Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Patients Undergoing Open Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
Sternotomi̇ ağrisinin yöneti̇mi̇nde transversus torasi̇k plan blok ve serratus anteri̇or plan blok kombi̇nasyonu i̇le erektör spi̇na plan blok etki̇nli̇ği̇ni̇n karşilaştirilmasi
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy of chest wall fascial plane blocks for cardiac surgery via median sternotomy: a network meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of pecto-intercostal fascial block on postoperative fatigue in elderly patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized clinical trial.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine in Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2025Trial
- Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Analgesic Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: Evaluating the Role of Nerve Block Techniques.The Clinical journal of pain · 2026Review
- Parasternal Intercostal Plane Blocks for Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review of Technical Refinements and Evidentiary Support.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Comparison of Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block Vs Transversus Thoracic Plane Block and Their Pharmacogenomics for Pain Management After Sternotomy in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Efficacy of ultrasound-guided, single-level, pectointercostal facial block (PIFB) for postoperative analgesia after sternotomy in paediatric cardiac surgery: A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Article
- Perioperative Considerations, Anesthetic Management and Transesophageal Echocardiographic Evaluation of Patients Undergoing the Ross Procedure.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- A Retrospective Review of the Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Transversus Thoracic Plane Block for Pain Management in Cardiac Surgeries.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Review
- Comparative Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Pain Management Approaches for Sternotomy in Cardiac Surgeries-Transversus Thoracic Muscle Plane Block vs Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block.Ochsner journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral pecto-intercostal fascial plane block as a pre-emptive analgesic adjunct in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomized, double-blinded study.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an association exists between cardiac surgery, performed through median sternotomy, and a considerable postoperative pain.
objectivesThe aim of the current study is to compare the effects of transversus thoracic muscle plane block (TTMPB) and pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) upon postoperative opioid consumption among the patients who underwent open cardiac surgery.
methodsThe present prospective, randomized, comparative study was conducted among 80 patients who underwent elective on-pump cardiac surgery with sternotomy. The subjects were randomly assigned to two groups with each group containing 40 individuals. For the TTMPB group, bilateral ultrasound-guided TTMPB was adopted in which 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was used on each side. In case of PIFB group, bilateral ultrasound-guided PIFB was adopted with the application of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side. The researchers recorded the first time for rescue analgesia, the overall dosage of rescue analgesia administered in the first 24 h after the operation and the postoperative complications.
resultsThe PIFB group took significantly longer time to raise the first request for rescue analgesia (7.8 ± 1.7 h) than the TTMPB group (6.7 ± 1.4 h). Likewise, the PIFB group subjects had a remarkably lower 'overall morphine usage' in the first 24 h after the operation (4.8 ± 1.0 mg) than TTMPB group (7.8 ± 2.0 mg).
conclusionBilateral ultrasound-guided PIFB provided a longer time for the first analgesic demand than bilateral ultrasound-guided TTMPB in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery. In addition to this, the PIFB reported less postoperative morphine usage than the TTMPB and increases satisfaction in these patients.
trial registrationThis study was registered at Clinical Trials.gov on 28/11/2022 (registration number: NCT05627869).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.