ArticleScientific reports2024
Estimation bias and agreement limits between two common self-report methods of habitual sleep duration in epidemiological surveys.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Infant Sleep Monitoring Using a Sensor-Enabled Responsive Bassinet: A Population-Scale Feasibility Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond Estrogen: Distribution and Hormonal Correlates of Serum Testosterone Among Postmenopausal U.S. Women, NHANES 2011-2016 and 2021-2023.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Sleep quality, duration, and multi-trajectories as predictors of rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from the english longitudinal study of ageing.Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Article
- Sleep, Physical Activity, and Mood Among People Seeking Mental Health Care.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Prevalence Rates of Frequent Dream Recall and Nightmares by Age, Gender and Sleep Duration in 16 Countries.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Effects of short sleep and sleep deprivation on thyroid hormones and indices: a Bayesian multilevel analysis from the ELSA-Brasil cohort.Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
- Sleep Duration, Chronotype, and Mortality in Parkinson's Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- Article
- Relationship between shift scheduling, sleep knowledge and sleep quality in medical trainees: protocol for a global cross-sectional survey.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Living by the clock of the book: religious observance enhances circadian stability and reduces social jetlag in older adults, a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Imbalances in the Content of Sleep and Pain Assessments in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Scoping Review.F1000Research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate measurement of habitual sleep duration (HSD) is crucial for understanding the relationship between sleep and health. This study aimed to assess the bias and agreement limits between two commonly used short HSD self-report methods, considering sleep quality (SQ) and social jetlag (SJL) as potential predictors of bias. Data from 10,268 participants in the International COVID Sleep Study-II (ICOSS-II) were used. Method-Self and Method-MCTQ were compared. Method-Self involved a single question about average nightly sleep duration (HSD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.