ArticleScientific reports2024
Current recommendations for procedure selection in class I and II obesity developed by an expert modified Delphi consensus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- The Genetic Blueprint of Obesity: From Pathogenesis to Novel Therapies.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025Review
- Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery for Class I Obesity (Body Mass Index 30-34.9 kg/mJournal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2025Review
- Impact of preconceptional vertical sleeve gastrectomy on metabolic, cardiovascular and hepatic functions of Sprague Dawley female rats and perinatal consequences.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Breast Cancer Characteristics after Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Matched Comparison to Patients with Severe Obesity.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- One-Year Outcomes of SADI-S in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/mObesity surgery · 2025Article
- Body roundness index trajectories in Chinese bariatric surgery patients: a retrospective longitudinal study.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Optimizing Nutritional Management Before and After Bariatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Guide for Sustained Weight Loss and Metabolic Health.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Effects of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin and pregabalin: A cohort study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development and evaluation of a shared decision-making system for choosing the type of bariatric surgery.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- The Risk of Leakage and Bleeding After Using the Ezisurg Endostapler Technique for Bariatric Surgery.Cureus · 2024Article
- Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeon Criteria-An International Experts' Consensus.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Gastric Wall Necrosis and Perforation Following Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) Coupled with Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) and Its Emergency Laparoscopic Surgical Management.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Impact of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Fatigue in Obese Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Bariatric surgery: trends in utilization, complications, conversions and revisions.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- From surgery to functional capacity: muscle strength modifications in women post sleeve gastrectomy.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
78 authors at 20 institutions in 29 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is widely considered the most effective option for treating obesity, a chronic, relapsing, and progressive disease. Recently, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) issued new guidelines on the indications for MBS, which have superseded the previous 1991 National Institutes of Health guidelines. The aim of this study is to establish the first set of consensus guidelines for selecting procedures in Class I and II obesity, using an Expert Modified Delphi Method. In this study, 78 experienced bariatric surgeons from 32 countries participated in a two-round Modified Delphi consensus voting process. The threshold for consensus was set at an agreement or disagreement of ≥ 70.0% among the experts. The experts reached a consensus on 54 statements. The committee of experts reached a consensus that MBS is a cost-effective treatment option for Class II obesity and for patients with Class I obesity who have not achieved significant weight loss through non-surgical methods. MBS was also considered suitable for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.