ArticleScientific reports2024
Advancing spinal cord injury care through non-invasive autonomic dysreflexia detection with AI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spinal Cord Segmentation and Injury Detection based on Siamese Conventional WideRes Network using CT Image.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Robust learning framework for a scalable remote monitoring of autonomic dysreflexia: use-case in spinal cord injury.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- α2δ-1-NMDAR1 complex in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus mediates anxiety-induced sympathetic hyperactivity.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026Article
- Microglial TREM2 and cognitive impairment: insights from Alzheimer's disease with implications for spinal cord injury and AI-assisted therapeutics.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents an AI-powered solution for detecting and monitoring Autonomic Dysreflexia (AD) in individuals with spinal cord injuries. Current AD detection methods are limited, lacking non-invasive monitoring systems. We propose a model that combines skin nerve activity (SKNA) signals with a deep neural network (DNN) architecture to overcome this limitation. The DNN is trained on a meticulously curated dataset obtained through controlled colorectal distension, inducing AD events in rats with spinal cord surgery above the T6 level. The proposed system achieves an impressive average classification accuracy of 93.9% ± 2.5%, ensuring accurate AD identification with high precision (95.2% ± 2.1%). It demonstrates a balanced performance with an average F1 score of 94.4% ± 1.8%, indicating a harmonious balance between precision and recall. Additionally, the system exhibits a low average false-negative rate of 4.8% ± 1.6%, minimizing the misclassification of non-AD cases. The robustness and generalizability of the system are validated on unseen data, maintaining high accuracy, F1 score, and a low false-negative rate. This AI-powered solution represents a significant advancement in non-invasive, real-time AD monitoring, with the potential to improve patient outcomes and enhance AD management in individuals with spinal cord injuries. This research contributes a promising solution to the critical healthcare challenge of AD detection and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.