Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38341444›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2024

Characteristics of discordance between amyloid positron emission tomography and plasma amyloid-β 42/40 positivity.

Jung-Min Pyun, Young Ho Park, Young Chul Youn, Min Ju Kang, Kyu Hwan Shim, Jae-Won Jang, Jihwan You, Kwangsik Nho, SangYun Kim, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AβJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 20 institutions in 4 countries.

Jung-Min PyunDepartment of Neurology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 59, Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04401, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8391-5729
Young Ho ParkDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Young Chul YounDepartment of Neurology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 06973, Republic of Korea.
Min Ju KangDepartment of Neurology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, 53, Jinhwangdo-ro 61-gil, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 05368, Republic of Korea.
Kyu Hwan ShimDepartment of Bionano Technology, Gachon University, 1342, Seongnamdaero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13120, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Won JangDepartment of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, 24289, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3540-530X
Jihwan YouDepartment of Neurology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 59, Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04401, Republic of Korea.
Kwangsik NhoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, and the Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, 355 W 16th, GH 4101, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
SangYun KimDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea. neuroksy@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-9101-5704
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
University of Southern California · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USWashington University in St. Louis · USAlzheimer's Association · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · USNorthwestern University · USPrevent Alzheimer’s Disease 2020 · USSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul · KRUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Utah · USAlzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation · USBanner Alzheimer’s InstituteBrown University · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG072972 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Charles DeCarli, Rachel A Whitmer · 2021 to 2026
$25.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072972NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various plasma biomarkers for amyloid-β (Aβ) have shown high predictability of amyloid PET positivity. However, the characteristics of discordance between amyloid PET and plasma Aβ42/40 positivity are poorly understood. Thorough interpretation of discordant cases is vital as Aβ plasma biomarker is imminent to integrate into clinical guidelines. We aimed to determine the characteristics of discordant groups between amyloid PET and plasma Aβ42/40 positivity, and inter-assays variability depending on plasma assays. We compared tau burden measured by PET, brain volume assessed by MRI, cross-sectional cognitive function, longitudinal cognitive decline and polygenic risk score (PRS) between PET/plasma groups (PET-/plasma-, PET-/plasma+, PET+/plasma-, PET+/plasma+) using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. Additionally, we investigated inter-assays variability between immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry method developed at Washington University (IP-MS-WashU) and Elecsys immunoassay from Roche (IA-Elc). PET+/plasma+ was significantly associated with higher tau burden assessed by PET in entorhinal, Braak III/IV, and Braak V/VI regions, and with decreased volume of hippocampal and precuneus regions compared to PET-/plasma-. PET+/plasma+ showed poor performances in global cognition, memory, executive and daily-life function, and rapid cognitive decline. PET+/plasma+ was related to high PRS. The PET-/plasma+ showed intermediate changes between PET-/plasma- and PET+/plasma+ in terms of tau burden, hippocampal and precuneus volume, cross-sectional and longitudinal cognition, and PRS. PET+/plasma- represented heterogeneous characteristics with most prominent variability depending on plasma assays. Moreover, IP-MS-WashU showed more linear association between amyloid PET standardized uptake value ratio and plasma Aβ42/40 than IA-Elc. IA-Elc showed more plasma Aβ42/40 positivity in the amyloid PET-negative stage than IP-MS-WashU. Characteristics of PET-/plasma+ support plasma biomarkers as early biomarker of amyloidopathy prior to amyloid PET. Various plasma biomarker assays might be applied distinctively to detect different target subjects or disease stages.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPositron-Emission Tomographytau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkerstau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID38341444
PMCPMC10858862
OpenAlexW4391717846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.