Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38341434›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Intercellular transfer of cancer cell invasiveness via endosome-mediated protease shedding.

Eva Maria Wenzel, Nina Marie Pedersen, Liv Anker Elfmark, Ling Wang, Ingrid Kjos, Espen Stang, Lene Malerød, Andreas Brech, Harald Stenmark, Camilla Raiborg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Amoeboid-mesenchymal transition and the proteolytic control of cancer invasion plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eva Maria WenzelCentre for Cancer Cell Reprogramming, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5561-3344
Nina Marie PedersenCentre for Cancer Cell Reprogramming, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Liv Anker ElfmarkCentre for Cancer Cell Reprogramming, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ling WangCentre for Cancer Cell Reprogramming, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid KjosCentre for Cancer Cell Reprogramming, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9166-3074
Espen StangLaboratory for Molecular and Cellular Cancer Research, Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lene MalerødCentre for Cancer Cell Reprogramming, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Andreas BrechCentre for Cancer Cell Reprogramming, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Harald StenmarkCentre for Cancer Cell Reprogramming, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1971-4252
Camilla RaiborgCentre for Cancer Cell Reprogramming, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. camilrai@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0002-5406-5403
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 788954Kreftforeningen (Norwegian Cancer Society) 182698Kreftforeningen (Norwegian Cancer Society) 198141Kreftforeningen (Norwegian Cancer Society) 246670Ministry of Health and Care Services | Helse Sør-Øst RHF (Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority) 2018081Norges Forskningsråd (Research Council of Norway) 262652Norges Forskningsråd (Research Council of Norway) 302994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overexpression of the transmembrane matrix metalloproteinase MT1-MMP/MMP14 promotes cancer cell invasion. Here we show that MT1-MMP-positive cancer cells turn MT1-MMP-negative cells invasive by transferring a soluble catalytic ectodomain of MT1-MMP. Surprisingly, this effect depends on the presence of TKS4 and TKS5 in the donor cell, adaptor proteins previously implicated in invadopodia formation. In endosomes of the donor cell, TKS4/5 promote ADAM-mediated cleavage of MT1-MMP by bridging the two proteases, and cleavage is stimulated by the low intraluminal pH of endosomes. The bridging depends on the PX domains of TKS4/5, which coincidently interact with the cytosolic tail of MT1-MMP and endosomal phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate. MT1-MMP recruits TKS4/5 into multivesicular endosomes for their subsequent co-secretion in extracellular vesicles, together with the enzymatically active ectodomain. The shed ectodomain converts non-invasive recipient cells into an invasive phenotype. Thus, TKS4/5 promote intercellular transfer of cancer cell invasiveness by facilitating ADAM-mediated shedding of MT1-MMP in acidic endosomes.

Indexed as

Matrix Metalloproteinase 14NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorEndosomesHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessPeptide HydrolasesMatrix Metalloproteinase 14Peptide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID38341434
PMCPMC10858897
OpenAlexW4391719645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.