Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38341381›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy to Treat Pseudomyxoma Peritonei of Ovarian Origin: A Retrospective French RENAPE Group Study.

Alexis Trecourt, Naoual Bakrin, Olivier Glehen, Witold Gertych, Laurent Villeneuve, Sylvie Isaac, Nazim Benzerdjeb, Juliette Fontaine, Catherine Genestie, Peggy Dartigues and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexis TrecourtHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Service de Pathologie, Lyon, France.
Naoual BakrinUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UR3738-Centre pour l'Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (CICLY), Lyon, France.
Olivier GlehenUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UR3738-Centre pour l'Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (CICLY), Lyon, France.
Witold GertychUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UR3738-Centre pour l'Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (CICLY), Lyon, France.
Laurent VilleneuveUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UR3738-Centre pour l'Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (CICLY), Lyon, France.
Sylvie IsaacHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Service de Pathologie, Lyon, France.
Nazim BenzerdjebHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Service de Pathologie, Lyon, France.
Juliette FontaineHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Service de Pathologie, Lyon, France.
Catherine GenestieInstitut Gustave Roussy, Service de Pathologie, Paris, France.
Peggy DartiguesInstitut Gustave Roussy, Service de Pathologie, Paris, France.
Agnès LerouxInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Service de Biopathologie CHRU-ICL, Nancy, France.
François QuenetInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier, Service de Chirurgie Digestive Oncologique, Montpellier, France.
Frederic MarchalInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Service de Chirurgie Oncologique, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Cecile OdinUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UR3738-Centre pour l'Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (CICLY), Lyon, France.
Lakhdar KhellafInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier, Service de Pathologie, Montpellier, France.
Magali SvrcekSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Service de d'Anatomie pathologique, Paris, France.
Sixte ThierryCenter Hospitalier de Valence, Service de Pathologie, Valence, France.
Marilyn AugrosCenter Hospitalier de Valence, Service de Pathologie, Valence, France.
Alhadeedi OmarDepartment of Surgery, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran *Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Service de Pathologie, Lyon, France. mojgan.devouassoux@chu-lyon.fr.
Vahan Kepenekian *Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UR3738-Centre pour l'Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (CICLY), Lyon, France.
RENAPE Group
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine · FRCentre Hospitalier de Valence · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRAmiri Hospital · KWSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian pseudomyxoma peritonei (OPMP) are rare, without well-defined therapeutic guidelines. We aimed to evaluate cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to treat OPMP.

methodsPatients from the French National Network for Rare Peritoneal Tumors (RENAPE) database with proven OPMP treated by CRS/HIPEC and with histologically normal appendix and digestive endoscopy were retrospectively included. Clinical and follow-up data were collected. Histopathological and immunohistochemical features were reviewed.

resultsFifteen patients with a median age of 56 years were included. The median Peritoneal Cancer Index was 16. Following CRS, the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score was CC-0 for 9/15 (60%) patients, CC-1 for 5/15 (33.3%) patients, and CC-2 for 1/15 (6.7%) patients. The median tumor size was 22.5 cm. After pathological review and immunohistochemical studies, tumors were classified as Group 1 (mucinous ovarian epithelial neoplasms) in 3/15 (20%) patients; Group 2 (mucinous neoplasm in ovarian teratoma) in 4/15 (26.7%) patients; Group 3 (mucinous neoplasm probably arising in ovarian teratoma) in 5/15 (33.3%) patients; and Group 4 (non-specific group) in 3/15 (20%) patients. Peritoneal lesions were OPMP pM1a/acellular, pM1b/grade 1 (hypocellular) and pM1b/grade 3 (signet-ring cells) in 13/15 (86.7%), 1/15 (6.7%) and 1/15 (6.7%) patients, respectively. Disease-free survival analysis showed a difference (p = 0.0463) between OPMP with teratoma/likely-teratoma origin (groups 2 and 3; 100% at 1, 5, and 10 years), and other groups (groups 1 and 4; 100%, 66.6%, and 50% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively).

conclusionThese results suggested that a primary therapeutic strategy using complete CRS/HIPEC for patients with OPMP led to favorable long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Appendiceal NeoplasmsHyperthermia, InducedNeoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and SerousPseudomyxoma PeritoneiTeratomaCombined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateCytoreductionHIPECMucinous tumor from teratomaOvarian carcinomaOvarian pseudomyxomaPeritoneal pseudomyxoma

Identifiers

PMID38341381
PMCPMC10997733
OpenAlexW4391713796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.