Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38341373›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2025

Application of NEMA protocols to verify GATE models based on the Digital Biograph Vision and the Biograph Vision Quadra scanners.

Miriam Magela Peña-Acosta, Sergio Gallardo, María Lorduy-Alós, Gumersindo Verdú

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Evaluation of deep learning-based scatter correction on a long-axial field-of-view PET scanner.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miriam Magela Peña-AcostaInstituto Universitario de Seguridad Industrial, Radiofísica y Medioambiental. Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera(s/n), 46022 València, Spain.
Sergio GallardoInstituto Universitario de Seguridad Industrial, Radiofísica y Medioambiental. Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera(s/n), 46022 València, Spain. Electronic address: sergalbe@iqn.upv.es.
María Lorduy-AlósInstituto Universitario de Seguridad Industrial, Radiofísica y Medioambiental. Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera(s/n), 46022 València, Spain.
Gumersindo VerdúInstituto Universitario de Seguridad Industrial, Radiofísica y Medioambiental. Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera(s/n), 46022 València, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Monte Carlo method is an effective tool to simulate and verify PET systems. Furthermore, it can help in the design and optimization of new medical imaging devices and algorithms. In this framework, the goal of this work is to verify the GATE toolkit performance when applied to simulate two Siemens Healthineers PET scanners: a standard axial field-of-view Biograph Vision scanner and the new long axial field-of-view Biograph Vision Quadra scanner.

methodsThe simulation toolkit GATE is based on GEANT4, comprising its main functionalities and a set of domain-specific features in the field of medical physics. To accomplish our purpose, the guidelines described in the NEMA NU 2-2018 protocol are reproduced. Then the simulated results are compared to experimental data available in the literature for both PET scanners. The assessment of the models includes different studies of sensitivity, count rate performances, spatial resolution and image quality. These tests are intended to evaluate the image quality of PET devices.

resultsIn the spatial resolution test, relative errors lower than 8% are obtained between the experiments and GATE models. The sensitivity is 17.2 cps/kBq (Vision) and 175.9 cps/kBq (Quadra), representing relative differences with the experiment of 6% and 0.3%, respectively. Deviations from peak NECR are less than 9%. In the Image Quality test, the contrast recovery coefficient for hot spheres, with 8 iterations and 5 subsets, ranges between 57-83% for Vision and 54-86% for Quadra. These values represent a maximum deviation between the simulations and the experiments of 10% for the Quadra scanner. In the case of the Vision scanner, the highest difference is observed for the 10 mm sphere (∼38%) due to the higher contrast recovery of the experiment caused by the Gibbs artifact from the use of PSF reconstruction.

conclusionsThe results of the simulations have provided evidence of a good agreement between the experimental data and the results obtained with GATE. Thus, this work supports the capability of this MC toolkit to accurately simulate the models of the Vision and Quadra scanners. This study has laid the basis for further research in this field and has identified several areas that could be explored.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMonte Carlo MethodPhantoms, ImagingGATEMonte CarloNEMA NU2-2018QuadraVision

Identifiers

PMID38341373
PMCPMC12664451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.