ReviewIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
Epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy: A review and local experience.
Review in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial scar in ischemic cardiomyopathy is predominantly endocardial, however, between 5% and 15% of these patients have an arrhythmogenic epicardial substrate. Percutaneous epicardial ablation should be considered in patients with ICM and VT especially if they failed an endocardial ablation. Simultaneous epicardial and endocardial ablation of VT in ICM may reduce short- and medium-term VT recurrence compared with an endocardial only approach. Cardiac imaging could be used to help guide patient selection for a combined epi-endo approach. Complications related to epicardial access can happen in up to 7% of patients. Epicardial ablation in these patients should be referred to experienced tertiary centers. We review the literature and share interesting cases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.