Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38340295›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2024

Incidence and imaging characteristics of difficult to detect retrospectively identified brain metastases in patients receiving repeat courses of stereotactic radiosurgery.

Andrew Fairchild, Joseph K Salama, Devon Godfrey, Walter F Wiggins, Bradley G Ackerson, Taofik Oyekunle, Donna Niedzwiecki, Peter E Fecci, John P Kirkpatrick, Scott R Floyd

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew FairchildDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. ATFairchild@novanthealth.org.
Joseph K SalamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Devon GodfreyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Walter F WigginsDeartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Bradley G AckersonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Taofik OyekunleDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Donna NiedzwieckiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Peter E FecciDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
John P KirkpatrickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Scott R FloydDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDuring stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning for brain metastases (BM), brain MRIs are reviewed to select appropriate targets based on radiographic characteristics. Some BM are difficult to detect and/or definitively identify and may go untreated initially, only to become apparent on future imaging. We hypothesized that in patients receiving multiple courses of SRS, reviewing the initial planning MRI would reveal early evidence of lesions that developed into metastases requiring SRS.

methodsPatients undergoing two or more courses of SRS to BM within 6 months between 2016 and 2018 were included in this single-institution, retrospective study. Brain MRIs from the initial course were reviewed for lesions at the same location as subsequently treated metastases; if present, this lesion was classified as a "retrospectively identified metastasis" or RIM. RIMs were subcategorized as meeting or not meeting diagnostic imaging criteria for BM (+ DC or -DC, respectively).

resultsAmong 683 patients undergoing 923 SRS courses, 98 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 115 repeat courses of SRS, with 345 treated metastases in the subsequent course, 128 of which were associated with RIMs found in a prior MRI. 58% of RIMs were + DC. 17 (15%) of subsequent courses consisted solely of metastases associated with + DC RIMs.

conclusionRadiographic evidence of brain metastases requiring future treatment was occasionally present on brain MRIs from prior SRS treatments. Most RIMs were + DC, and some subsequent SRS courses treated only + DC RIMs. These findings suggest enhanced BM detection might enable earlier treatment and reduce the need for additional SRS.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryHumansIncidenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesBrain metastasesComputer-aided detectionSRSStereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID38340295
OpenAlexW4391722227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.