Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38340264›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2024

A Combined Manual Annotation and Deep-Learning Natural Language Processing Study on Accurate Entity Extraction in Hereditary Disease Related Biomedical Literature.

Dao-Ling Huang, Quanlei Zeng, Yun Xiong, Shuixia Liu, Chaoqun Pang, Menglei Xia, Ting Fang, Yanli Ma, Cuicui Qiang, Yi Zhang and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dao-Ling HuangBGI Research, Shenzhen, 518083, China. dlhuang1217@gmail.com.
Quanlei ZengBGI-Wuhan Clinical Laboratories, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Yun XiongBGI-Wuhan Clinical Laboratories, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Shuixia LiuBGI-Wuhan Clinical Laboratories, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Chaoqun PangBGI-Wuhan Clinical Laboratories, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Menglei XiaBGI-Wuhan Clinical Laboratories, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Ting FangBGI-Wuhan Clinical Laboratories, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Yanli MaBGI-Wuhan Clinical Laboratories, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Cuicui QiangBGI-Wuhan Clinical Laboratories, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Yi ZhangBGI-Wuhan Clinical Laboratories, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Yu ZhangBGI-Wuhan Clinical Laboratories, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Hong LiBGI-Wuhan Clinical Laboratories, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Yuying YuanClinical Laboratory of BGI Health, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
BGI Group (China) · CNBGI Research

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32001076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a combined manual annotation and deep-learning natural language processing study to make accurate entity extraction in hereditary disease related biomedical literature. A total of 400 full articles were manually annotated based on published guidelines by experienced genetic interpreters at Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI). The performance of our manual annotations was assessed by comparing our re-annotated results with those publicly available. The overall Jaccard index was calculated to be 0.866 for the four entity types-gene, variant, disease and species. Both a BERT-based large name entity recognition (NER) model and a DistilBERT-based simplified NER model were trained, validated and tested, respectively. Due to the limited manually annotated corpus, Such NER models were fine-tuned with two phases. The F1-scores of BERT-based NER for gene, variant, disease and species are 97.28%, 93.52%, 92.54% and 95.76%, respectively, while those of DistilBERT-based NER are 95.14%, 86.26%, 91.37% and 89.92%, respectively. Most importantly, the entity type of variant has been extracted by a large language model for the first time and a comparable F1-score with the state-of-the-art variant extraction model tmVar has been achieved.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNatural Language ProcessingData MiningGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansPublicationsData miningGenomicsName entity recognitionNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID38340264
PMCPMC11289304
OpenAlexW4391721420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.