Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38340093›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

On the core segmentation algorithms of copy number variation detection tools.

Yibo Zhang, Wenyu Liu, Junbo Duan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Copy Number Variation in Asthma: An Integrative Review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yibo ZhangKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education and Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.ORCID 0009-0004-7363-6509
Wenyu LiuKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education and Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Junbo DuanKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education and Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61771381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shotgun sequencing is a high-throughput method used to detect copy number variants (CNVs). Although there are numerous CNV detection tools based on shotgun sequencing, their quality varies significantly, leading to performance discrepancies. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of next-generation sequencing-based CNV detection tools over the past decade. Our findings revealed that the majority of mainstream tools employ similar detection rationale: calculates the so-called read depth signal from aligned sequencing reads and then segments the signal by utilizing either circular binary segmentation (CBS) or hidden Markov model (HMM). Hence, we compared the performance of those two core segmentation algorithms in CNV detection, considering varying sequencing depths, segment lengths and complex types of CNVs. To ensure a fair comparison, we designed a parametrical model using mainstream statistical distributions, which allows for pre-excluding bias correction such as guanine-cytosine (GC) content during the preprocessing step. The results indicate the following key points: (1) Under ideal conditions, CBS demonstrates high precision, while HMM exhibits a high recall rate. (2) For practical conditions, HMM is advantageous at lower sequencing depths, while CBS is more competitive in detecting small variant segments compared to HMM. (3) In case involving complex CNVs resembling real sequencing, HMM demonstrates more robustness compared with CBS. (4) When facing large-scale sequencing data, HMM costs less time compared with the CBS, while their memory usage is approximately equal. This can provide an important guidance and reference for researchers to develop new tools for CNV detection.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNA Copy Number VariationsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencingcircular binary segmentationcopy number variantshidden Markov modelnext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38340093
PMCPMC10858679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.