ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
On the core segmentation algorithms of copy number variation detection tools.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational strategies for copy number variation detection, disease association, and beyond.Genome biology · 2026Review
- Metabolic reprogramming-associated genomic instability drives colorectal cancer progression via the UBXN1-NF-κB axis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Alzheimer's disease: genetic background in the era of next-generation sequencing technologies.Brain communications · 2026Review
- ZIPcnv: accurate and efficient inference of copy number variations from shallow whole-genome sequencing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Comparative study of tools for copy number variation detection using next-generation sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- HapCNV: A Comprehensive Framework for CNV Detection in Low-input DNA Sequencing Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Copy Number Variation in Asthma: An Integrative Review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- LoRA-TV: read depth profile-based clustering of tumor cells in single-cell sequencing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shotgun sequencing is a high-throughput method used to detect copy number variants (CNVs). Although there are numerous CNV detection tools based on shotgun sequencing, their quality varies significantly, leading to performance discrepancies. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of next-generation sequencing-based CNV detection tools over the past decade. Our findings revealed that the majority of mainstream tools employ similar detection rationale: calculates the so-called read depth signal from aligned sequencing reads and then segments the signal by utilizing either circular binary segmentation (CBS) or hidden Markov model (HMM). Hence, we compared the performance of those two core segmentation algorithms in CNV detection, considering varying sequencing depths, segment lengths and complex types of CNVs. To ensure a fair comparison, we designed a parametrical model using mainstream statistical distributions, which allows for pre-excluding bias correction such as guanine-cytosine (GC) content during the preprocessing step. The results indicate the following key points: (1) Under ideal conditions, CBS demonstrates high precision, while HMM exhibits a high recall rate. (2) For practical conditions, HMM is advantageous at lower sequencing depths, while CBS is more competitive in detecting small variant segments compared to HMM. (3) In case involving complex CNVs resembling real sequencing, HMM demonstrates more robustness compared with CBS. (4) When facing large-scale sequencing data, HMM costs less time compared with the CBS, while their memory usage is approximately equal. This can provide an important guidance and reference for researchers to develop new tools for CNV detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.