ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2025
Robotic hernia repair with the novel HUGO robot system - An initial experience from a tertiary centre.
Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic and Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Africa: Current Adoption, Challenges, and Future Horizons.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Review
- Application of the Hugo™ RAS robotic system in general surgery: a scoping review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Use of HugoJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHernia repair using robotic platforms has been on the rise in the last decade. The HUGO robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) system, introduced in 2021, is a new addition to the field. In this study, we share our experience with this innovative system for the management of ventral and groin hernias. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using the HUGO robotic platform for hernia surgeries. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all hernia surgeries performed with the HUGO system over a 1-year study period. The study assessed various aspects, including the technical manoeuvres of the robotic system, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, post-operative pain levels and 30-day morbidity rates. RESULTS AND
conclusionsA total of seven hernia surgeries were performed using the HUGO system, including five ventral hernias and two groin hernias. The average duration of surgery was 128 min, with a docking duration of 22.8 min. Notably, there were no intraoperative or post-operative adverse events reported during these procedures. The HUGO system features an open console that provides a panoramic view of the operating room. In addition, the individual arm carts can be easily manoeuvred around the operating table, facilitating improved access to multiple quadrants during surgery. In our case series, Robotic hernia repair using the HUGO system has demonstrated feasibility, with post-operative outcomes comparable to traditional approaches. This innovative system serves as an additional tool in the armamentarium of hernia surgery and shows potential for improving surgical outcomes. However, further investigation through large-scale prospective studies is necessary to comprehensively evaluate its efficacy and benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.