Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339991›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2024

Consuming Patients' Days: Time Spent on Ambulatory Appointments by People With Cancer.

Sana Kagalwalla, Alexander K Tsai, Manju George, Anna Waldock, Sydney Davis, Patricia Jewett, Rachel I Vogel, Ishani Ganguli, Christopher Booth, Stacie B Dusetzina and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Time toxicity in cancer care: a systematic review of definitions and measurement methods.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Cancer patients' experiences of "time toxicity": a qualitative meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Time toxicity among patients with cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The experience of time toxicity in cancer patients: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Patient-, care partner-, and clinician-proposed solutions to address the time toxicity of cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sana KagalwallaUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Alexander K TsaiUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Manju GeorgePaltown Development Foundation/COLONTOWN, Crownsville, MD, USA.
Anna WaldockUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sydney DavisUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Patricia JewettUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Rachel I VogelUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Ishani GanguliDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher BoothDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Stacie B DusetzinaDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Gabrielle B RocqueDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4188-9785
Anne H BlaesUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Arjun GuptaUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0875-4731

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
TRAINING GRANT IN MICROBIOLOGY/CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Scott M. Dehm · 1985 to 2026
$11.3M
The Role of Virtual Care in Improving Primary Care Access and Continuity for At-Risk Multimorbid Older AdultsK23AG068240 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GANGULI, ISHANI · 2021 to 2025
$842k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009138NIA NIH HHS K23 AG068240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn qualitative work, patients report that seemingly short trips to clinic (eg, a supposed 10-minute blood draw) often turn into "all-day affairs." We sought to quantify the time patients with cancer spend attending ambulatory appointments.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of patients scheduled for oncology-related ambulatory care (eg, labs, imaging, procedures, infusions, and clinician visits) at an academic cancer center over 1 week. The primary exposure was the ambulatory service type(s) (eg, clinician visit only, labs and infusion, etc.). We used Real-Time Location System badge data to calculate clinic times and estimated round-trip travel times and parking times. We calculated and summarized clinic and total (clinic + travel + parking) times for ambulatory service types.

resultsWe included 435 patients. Across all service day type(s), the median (IQR) clinic time was 119 (78-202) minutes. The estimated median (IQR) round-trip driving distance and travel time was 34 (17-49) miles and 50 (36-68) minutes. The median (IQR) parking time was 14 (12-15) minutes. Overall, the median (IQR) total time was 197 (143-287) minutes. The median total times for specific service type(s) included: 99 minutes for lab-only, 144 minutes for clinician visit only, and 278 minutes for labs, clinician visit, and infusion.

conclusionPatients often spent several hours pursuing ambulatory cancer care on a given day. Accounting for opportunity time costs and the coordination of activities around ambulatory care, these results highlight the substantial time burdens of cancer care, and support the notion that many days with ambulatory health care contact may represent "lost days."

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAppointments and SchedulesNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime Factorsambulatory appointmentscontact dayslogistic toxicitytime burdenstime toxicity

Identifiers

PMID38339991
PMCPMC11067814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.