ArticleHuman brain mapping2024
Fibre orientation atlas guided rapid segmentation of white matter tracts.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Centre Reproducibility of DTI and NODDI in White Matter Tracts Segmented Using TractFinder Across Three MRI Scanners of the Same Model.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- A rapid streamline-based extension of Tractfinder for white matter tract segmentation.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Innovations in Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery: Scoping Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in corticospinal tract segmentation using constrained spherical deconvolution.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Fibre orientation atlas guided rapid segmentation of white matter tracts.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Diffusion MRI with Machine Learning.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fibre tract delineation from diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable clinical tool for neurosurgical planning and navigation, as well as in research neuroimaging pipelines. Several popular methods are used for this task, each with different strengths and weaknesses making them more or less suited to different contexts. For neurosurgical imaging, priorities include ease of use, computational efficiency, robustness to pathology and ability to generalise to new tracts of interest. Many existing methods use streamline tractography, which may require expert neuroimaging operators for setting parameters and delineating anatomical regions of interest, or suffer from as a lack of generalisability to clinical scans involving deforming tumours and other pathologies. More recently, data-driven approaches including deep-learning segmentation models and streamline clustering methods have improved reproducibility and automation, although they can require large amounts of training data and/or computationally intensive image processing at the point of application. We describe an atlas-based direct tract mapping technique called 'tractfinder', utilising tract-specific location and orientation priors. Our aim was to develop a clinically practical method avoiding streamline tractography at the point of application while utilising prior anatomical knowledge derived from only 10-20 training samples. Requiring few training samples allows emphasis to be placed on producing high quality, neuro-anatomically accurate training data, and enables rapid adaptation to new tracts of interest. Avoiding streamline tractography at the point of application reduces computational time, false positives and vulnerabilities to pathology such as tumour deformations or oedema. Carefully filtered training streamlines and track orientation distribution mapping are used to construct tract specific orientation and spatial probability atlases in standard space. Atlases are then transformed to target subject space using affine registration and compared with the subject's voxel-wise fibre orientation distribution data using a mathematical measure of distribution overlap, resulting in a map of the tract's likely spatial distribution. This work includes extensive performance evaluation and comparison with benchmark techniques, including streamline tractography and the deep-learning method TractSeg, in two publicly available healthy diffusion MRI datasets (from TractoInferno and the Human Connectome Project) in addition to a clinical dataset comprising paediatric and adult brain tumour scans. Tract segmentation results display high agreement with established techniques while requiring less than 3 min on average when applied to a new subject. Results also display higher robustness than compared methods when faced with clinical scans featuring brain tumours and resections. As well as describing and evaluating a novel proposed tract delineation technique, this work continues the discussion on the challenges surrounding the white matter segmentation task, including issues of anatomical definitions and the use of quantitative segmentation comparison metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.