A Novel Approach to Evaluating Crosstalk for Near-Infrared Spectrometers.

Zemeng Chen, Xinliang Cao, Xianglin Li, Boan Pan, Pengbo Wang, Ting Li

Open access · goldAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zemeng ChenBiomedical Engineering Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China.

Xinliang CaoBiomedical Engineering Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China.

Xianglin LiState Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films & Integrated Devices, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China.

Boan PanState Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films & Integrated Devices, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China.

Pengbo WangState Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films & Integrated Devices, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China.

Ting LiBiomedical Engineering Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China.

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNJianghan University · CN

Funding

Basic Research Program for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Coordination grant no. 19JCZDJC65500(Z)Medical and Health Innovation Project grant nos. 2021-I2M-1-042Medical and Health Innovation Project grant nos. 2021-I2M-1-058Medical and Health Innovation Project grant nos. 2022-I2M-C&T-A-005National Natural Science Foundation of China grant no. 81971660Program of Chinese Institute for Brain Research in Beijing grant no. 2020-NKX-XM-14Sichuan Science and Technology Program grant no. 2021YFH0004Tianjin Outstanding Youth Fund Project grant no. 20JCJQIC00230

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-channel and multi-parameter near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has gradually become a new research direction and hot spot due to its ability to provide real-time, continuous, comprehensive indicators of multiple parameters. However, multi-channel and multi-parameter detection may lead to crosstalk between signals. There is still a lack of benchmarks for the evaluation of the reliability, sensitivity, stability and response consistency of the NIRS instruments. In this study, a set of test methods (a human blood model test, ink drop test, multi-channel crosstalk test and multi-parameter crosstalk test) for analyzing crosstalk and verifying the reliability of NIRS was conducted to test experimental verification on a multi-channel (8-channel), multi-parameter (4-parameter) NIRS instrument independently developed by our team. Results show that these tests can be used to analyze the signal crosstalk and verify the reliability, sensitivity, stability and response consistency of the NIRS instrument. This study contributes to the establishment of benchmarks for the NIRS instrument crosstalk and reliability testing. These novel tests have the potential to become the benchmark for NIRS instrument reliability testing.

Indexed as

crosstalk analysismulti-channelmulti-parametermulti-wavelengthnear-infrared spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID38339709

DOI10.3390/s24030990

PMCPMC10857642

OpenAlexW4391562445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.