ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
IHIBE: A Hierarchical and Delegated Access Control Mechanism for IoT Environments.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hierarchical secure key assignment scheme.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensuring authorized access control in the IoT is vital for privacy and safety protection. Our study presents the novel IHIBE framework, which combines IOTA (a distributed ledger technology) with hierarchical identity-based encryption (HIBE), thereby enhancing both IoT security and scalability. This approach secures access tokens and policies while reducing the computational demand on data owners. Our empirical findings reveal a significant performance gap, with access rights delegation on the Raspberry Pi 4 exceeding those on AWS by over 250%. Moreover, our analysis uncovers optimal identity policy depths: up to 640 identities on AWS and 640 on the Raspberry Pi 4 for systems with higher tolerable delays, and 320 identities on AWS versus 160 on the Raspberry Pi 4 for systems with lower tolerable delays. The system shows practical viability, exhibiting insignificant operational time differences compared to Zhang et al.'s schemes, particularly in access rights verification processes, with a minimal difference of 33.35%. Our extensive security assessment, encompassing scenarios like encrypted token theft and compromise of authority, affirms the efficacy of our challenge-response and last-word challenge (LWC) mechanisms. This study underscores the importance of platform choice in IoT system architectures and provides insights for deploying efficient, secure, and scalable IoT environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.