Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339629›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Analytic Continuation, Phase Unwrapping, and Retrieval of the Refractive Index of Metamaterials from S-Parameters.

Giovanni Angiulli, Mario Versaci, Salvatore Calcagno, Paolo Di Barba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giovanni AngiulliDepartment of Information Engineering, Infrastructures and Sustainable Energy, Mediterranea University, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3153-9338
Mario VersaciDepartment of Civil, Energetic, Environmental and Material Engineering, Mediterranea University, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3837-6671
Salvatore CalcagnoDepartment of Civil, Energetic, Environmental and Material Engineering, Mediterranea University, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Paolo Di BarbaDipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale e dell'Informazione, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5293-1809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heuristic homogenization approach is intensively employed to characterize electromagnetic metamaterials (MMs). The effective parameters are extracted within this framework using the Nicolson-Ross-Weir (NRW) method. Special attention must be devoted to handling this procedure because of the branch ambiguity issue affecting it, i.e., the lack of uniqueness in the evaluation of the effective refractive index neff rooted in the use of the multivalued complex logarithm to invert the Airy-Fresnel relation. Over the years, several techniques based on the phase-unwrapping approach have been introduced, but without any theoretical justification. In this paper, we aim to clarify the theoretical connection between the phase unwrapping method and the analytic continuation theory framework. Furthermore, three-phase-unwrapping approaches, which descend directly from the theory we discussed, are compared to identify which approach is best suited to reconstruct the complex refractive index of metamaterials when the NRW method is applicable.

Indexed as

metamaterialsphase unwrappingscattering parameters

Identifiers

PMID38339629
PMCPMC10857680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.