Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339610›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparison of ECG Saline-Conduction Technique and ECG Wire-Based Technique for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Giuseppe Gullo, Pierre Frossard, Anaïs Colin, Salah Dine Qanadli

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe GulloLausanne University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9222-0622
Pierre FrossardLausanne University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9053-9434
Anaïs ColinLausanne University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Salah Dine QanadliFaculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1330-660X
Hôpital Riviera-Chablais · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

University of Lausanne NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is commonly used in medicine. The tip position was shown to be a major determinant in PICC function and related complications. Recent advances in ECG guidance might facilitate daily practice. This study aimed to compare two ECG techniques, in terms of their tip-position accuracy, puncture site layout, and signal quality; (2) Methods: This randomized open study (1:1) included 320 participants. One PICC guidance technique used ECG signal transmission with saline (ST); the other technique used a guidewire (WT). Techniques were compared by the distance between the catheter tip and the cavoatrial junction (DCAJ) on chest X-rays, insertion-point hemostasis time, and the extracorporeal catheter length between the hub and the insertion point; (3) Results: The mean DCAJs were significantly different between ST (1.36 cm, 95% CI: 1.22-1.37) and WT (1.12 cm, 95% CI: 0.98-1.25;

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCentral Venous CathetersElectrocardiographyHumansPuncturesRadiographycatheterizationcentral venous catheterselectrocardiographyhemostasisinterventional radiologyperipheralsuperior vena cava

Identifiers

PMID38339610
PMCPMC10857526
OpenAlexW4391344936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.