Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339594›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Exploring Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for EEG Feature Extraction.

Ildar Rakhmatulin, Minh-Son Dao, Amir Nassibi, Danilo Mandic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. GEM-CRAP: a fusion architecture for focal seizure detection.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ildar RakhmatulinDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Minh-Son DaoNational Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Tokyo 184-0015, Japan.
Amir NassibiDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2929-0246
Danilo MandicDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8432-3963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to provide information on how to create a convolutional neural network (CNN) for extracting features from EEG signals. Our task was to understand the primary aspects of creating and fine-tuning CNNs for various application scenarios. We considered the characteristics of EEG signals, coupled with an exploration of various signal processing and data preparation techniques. These techniques include noise reduction, filtering, encoding, decoding, and dimension reduction, among others. In addition, we conduct an in-depth analysis of well-known CNN architectures, categorizing them into four distinct groups: standard implementation, recurrent convolutional, decoder architecture, and combined architecture. This paper further offers a comprehensive evaluation of these architectures, covering accuracy metrics, hyperparameters, and an appendix that contains a table outlining the parameters of commonly used CNN architectures for feature extraction from EEG signals.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyNeural Networks, ComputerInterior Design and FurnishingsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedCNNEEGmachine learningsignal processing

Identifiers

PMID38339594
PMCPMC10856895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.