Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339531›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Intra-Atlas Node Size Effects on Graph Metrics in fMRI Data: Implications for Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitive Impairment.

Sahithi Kolla, Haleh Falakshahi, Anees Abrol, Zening Fu, Vince D Calhoun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sahithi KollaTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Haleh FalakshahiTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Anees AbrolTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Zening FuTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Vince D CalhounTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Georgia State University · USCenter for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Data driven dynamic activity/connectivity methods for early detection of Alzheimer’sR01AG073949 · NIA · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network neuroscience, a multidisciplinary field merging insights from neuroscience and network theory, offers a profound understanding of neural network intricacies. However, the impact of varying node sizes on computed graph metrics in neuroimaging data remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by adopting a data-driven methodology to delineate functional nodes and assess their influence on graph metrics. Using the Neuromark framework, automated independent component analysis is applied to resting state fMRI data, capturing functional network connectivity (FNC) matrices. Global and local graph metrics reveal intricate connectivity patterns, emphasizing the need for nuanced analysis. Notably, node sizes, computed based on voxel counts, contribute to a novel metric termed 'node-metric coupling' (NMC). Correlations between graph metrics and node dimensions are consistently observed. The study extends its analysis to a dataset comprising Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and control subjects, showcasing the potential of NMC as a biomarker for brain disorders. The two key outcomes underscore the interplay between node sizes and resultant graph metrics within a given atlas, shedding light on an often-overlooked source of variability. Additionally, the study highlights the utility of NMC as a valuable biomarker, emphasizing the necessity of accounting for node sizes in future neuroimaging investigations. This work contributes to refining comparative studies employing diverse atlases and advocates for thoughtful consideration of intra-atlas node size in shaping graph metrics, paving the way for more robust neuroimaging research.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBiomarkersBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiomarkersbrain networksfMRIfunctional network connectivitygraph metricsnode size

Identifiers

PMID38339531
PMCPMC10857295
OpenAlexW4391345706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.