Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339469›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Systematic Review and Identification of the Challenges of Deep Learning Techniques for Undersampled Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction.

Md Biddut Hossain, Rupali Kiran Shinde, Sukhoon Oh, Ki-Chul Kwon, Nam Kim

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Biddut HossainSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju-si 28644, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-9128
Rupali Kiran ShindeSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju-si 28644, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4631-5353
Sukhoon OhResearch Equipment Operation Department, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju-si 28119, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-240X
Ki-Chul KwonSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju-si 28644, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0334-504X
Nam KimSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju-si 28644, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8109-2055

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2020R1A2C1101258The MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea IITP-2023-2020-0-01846The South Korean government (MSIP) No.2021-0-00490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows excellent performance in image reconstruction from undersampled k-space data. Artifact-free and high-quality MRI reconstruction is essential for ensuring accurate diagnosis, supporting clinical decision-making, enhancing patient safety, facilitating efficient workflows, and contributing to the validity of research studies and clinical trials. Recently, deep learning has demonstrated several advantages over conventional MRI reconstruction methods. Conventional methods rely on manual feature engineering to capture complex patterns and are usually computationally demanding due to their iterative nature. Conversely, DL methods use neural networks with hundreds of thousands of parameters and automatically learn relevant features and representations directly from the data. Nevertheless, there are some limitations to DL-based techniques concerning MRI reconstruction tasks, such as the need for large, labeled datasets, the possibility of overfitting, and the complexity of model training. Researchers are striving to develop DL models that are more efficient, adaptable, and capable of providing valuable information for medical practitioners. We provide a comprehensive overview of the current developments and clinical uses by focusing on state-of-the-art DL architectures and tools used in MRI reconstruction. This study has three objectives. Our main objective is to describe how various DL designs have changed over time and talk about cutting-edge tactics, including their advantages and disadvantages. Hence, data pre- and post-processing approaches are assessed using publicly available MRI datasets and source codes. Secondly, this work aims to provide an extensive overview of the ongoing research on transformers and deep convolutional neural networks for rapid MRI reconstruction. Thirdly, we discuss several network training strategies, like supervised, unsupervised, transfer learning, and federated learning for rapid and efficient MRI reconstruction. Consequently, this article provides significant resources for future improvement of MRI data pre-processing and fast image reconstruction.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, Computer3D MRIdeep learningDL toolsfederated learningMRI datasetsSwin transformertransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID38339469
PMCPMC10856856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.