SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Systematic Review and Identification of the Challenges of Deep Learning Techniques for Undersampled Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantification of edge-enhancing effects using accelerated deep learning reconstructed orbital MRI sequences.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Advances in artificial intelligence and thermal analysis for brain tumor detection: a review of models, methods, and modalities.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Impact of AIR™ Recon DL on magnetic resonance imaging-based quantitative brain structure measurements.Psychoradiology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based acceleration and denoising of 0.55T MRI for enhanced conspicuity of vestibular Schwannoma post contrast administration.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence in Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Medical Imaging.Cureus · 2025Review
- Optimized deep learning-accelerated single-breath-hold abdominal HASTE with and without fat saturation improves and accelerates abdominal imaging at 3 Tesla.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary, Clinical Assessment of Accelerated Deep-Learning MRI Protocols at 1.5 T and 3 T After Intracranial Tumor Surgery and Their Influence on Residual Tumor Perception.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Understanding stress-induced illegitimate aggression: the role of physiological and psychological factors in police cadets.Biologia futura · 2025Article
- Deep learning super-resolution reconstruction for fast and high-quality cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance.European radiology · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary quantitative and qualitative assessment of IDH-mutant gliomas with full diagnostic deep learning image reconstruction.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
- Enhancing IoT Healthcare with Federated Learning and Variational Autoencoder.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Synergizing Deep Learning-Enabled Preprocessing and Human-AI Integration for Efficient Automatic Ground Truth Generation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Swin Transformer and the Unet Architecture to Correct Motion Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based reconstruction improves MRI image quality and diagnostic performance for carotid atherosclerotic plaques.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows excellent performance in image reconstruction from undersampled k-space data. Artifact-free and high-quality MRI reconstruction is essential for ensuring accurate diagnosis, supporting clinical decision-making, enhancing patient safety, facilitating efficient workflows, and contributing to the validity of research studies and clinical trials. Recently, deep learning has demonstrated several advantages over conventional MRI reconstruction methods. Conventional methods rely on manual feature engineering to capture complex patterns and are usually computationally demanding due to their iterative nature. Conversely, DL methods use neural networks with hundreds of thousands of parameters and automatically learn relevant features and representations directly from the data. Nevertheless, there are some limitations to DL-based techniques concerning MRI reconstruction tasks, such as the need for large, labeled datasets, the possibility of overfitting, and the complexity of model training. Researchers are striving to develop DL models that are more efficient, adaptable, and capable of providing valuable information for medical practitioners. We provide a comprehensive overview of the current developments and clinical uses by focusing on state-of-the-art DL architectures and tools used in MRI reconstruction. This study has three objectives. Our main objective is to describe how various DL designs have changed over time and talk about cutting-edge tactics, including their advantages and disadvantages. Hence, data pre- and post-processing approaches are assessed using publicly available MRI datasets and source codes. Secondly, this work aims to provide an extensive overview of the ongoing research on transformers and deep convolutional neural networks for rapid MRI reconstruction. Thirdly, we discuss several network training strategies, like supervised, unsupervised, transfer learning, and federated learning for rapid and efficient MRI reconstruction. Consequently, this article provides significant resources for future improvement of MRI data pre-processing and fast image reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.