ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Wearable Inertial Sensor Approach for Locomotion and Localization Recognition on Physical Activity.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Inertial-Visual Sensor Fusion over Evolutionary Deep Temporal Modeling for Humanoid Movement Recognition: A Benchmark Study Toward Sports Telerehabilitation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Correlation of Biomechanical Variables of Lower Extremity Movement During Functional Tests and Tasks in Youth League Football Players: Cross-Sectional Correlation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Methodological Survey of Human Activity Recognition Across Diverse Data Modalities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Sensor-Based Automatic Recognition of Construction Worker Activities Using Deep Learning Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Hybrid Approach for Sports Activity Recognition Using Key Body Descriptors and Hybrid Deep Learning Classifier.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing the Transformer Model with a Convolutional Feature Extractor Block and Vector-Based Relative Position Embedding for Human Activity Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Automated Pipeline for Robust Cat Activity Detection Based on Deep Learning and Wearable Sensor Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Leveraging artificial neural networks for enhanced athlete performance evaluation through IMU data analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Effect of Data-Processing Methods on Acceleration Summary Metrics of GNSS Devices in Elite Australian Football.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Target detection and classification via EfficientDet and CNN over unmanned aerial vehicles.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in sensing technology have expanded the capabilities of both wearable devices and smartphones, which are now commonly equipped with inertial sensors such as accelerometers and gyroscopes. Initially, these sensors were used for device feature advancement, but now, they can be used for a variety of applications. Human activity recognition (HAR) is an interesting research area that can be used for many applications like health monitoring, sports, fitness, medical purposes, etc. In this research, we designed an advanced system that recognizes different human locomotion and localization activities. The data were collected from raw sensors that contain noise. In the first step, we detail our noise removal process, which employs a Chebyshev type 1 filter to clean the raw sensor data, and then the signal is segmented by utilizing Hamming windows. After that, features were extracted for different sensors. To select the best feature for the system, the recursive feature elimination method was used. We then used SMOTE data augmentation techniques to solve the imbalanced nature of the Extrasensory dataset. Finally, the augmented and balanced data were sent to a long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning classifier for classification. The datasets used in this research were Real-World Har, Real-Life Har, and Extrasensory. The presented system achieved 89% for Real-Life Har, 85% for Real-World Har, and 95% for the Extrasensory dataset. The proposed system outperforms the available state-of-the-art methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.