ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Real-Time Walk Error Compensation Method Using Echo Signal Magnitude Measurement in ToF Laser Scanners.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-Time Walk Error Compensation Method Using Echo Signal Magnitude Measurement in ToF Laser Scanners.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid advancement of mobile laser scanner technology used for terrain mapping, among other things, imposes increasing requirements for scanning frequency and distance measurement accuracy. To meet these requirements, rangefinder modules are expected to operate with high echo signal dynamics and to allow accurate distance measurement even based on single-laser-pulse echo detection. Such performance can be potentially achieved using pulsed time-of-flight (ToF) laser rangefinders (LRF). In conventional ToF modules, however, the STOP signal (for time counter interruption) is generated using a straightforward fixed-threshold comparator method. Unfortunately, it corresponds to the so-called walk error, i.e., the dependence of the measured time of flight on the magnitude of the echo signal. In most ranging applications, however, the LRF detection channel can be exposed to an extremely large span of received echo power levels, which depend on the distance measured, type of target surface, atmospheric transmission, etc. Thus, the walk error is an inseparable element of the conventional ToF technique and creates a fundamental limit for its precision. This article presents a novel method of walk error compensation in real time. By using our authorial electronic circuit for measuring the magnitude of the echo signal, it is possible to effectively compensate for the walk error even when the echo signal brings the detection channel amplifiers into saturation. In addition, the paper presents a laboratory method for calibrating the walk error compensation curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.