Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339425›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

AI-Driven Models for Diagnosing and Predicting Outcomes in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohammed Kanan, Hajar Alharbi, Nawaf Alotaibi, Lubna Almasuood, Shahad Aljoaid, Tuqa Alharbi, Leen Albraik, Wojod Alothman, Hadeel Aljohani, Aghnar Alzahrani and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Frontiers of Smart Healthcare Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Research.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammed KananDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh 12211, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6687-0461
Hajar AlharbiDepartment of Medicine, Gdansk Medical University, 80210 Gdansk, Poland.
Nawaf AlotaibiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Northern Border University, Rafha 73213, Saudi Arabia.
Lubna AlmasuoodDepartment of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia.
Shahad AljoaidDepartment of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47911, Saudi Arabia.
Tuqa AlharbiDepartment of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0004-8381-7637
Leen AlbraikDepartment of Medicine, Al-Faisal University, Riyadh 12385, Saudi Arabia.
Wojod AlothmanDepartment of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31411, Saudi Arabia.
Hadeel AljohaniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22230, Saudi Arabia.
Aghnar AlzahraniDepartment of Medicine, Al-Baha University, Al Bahah 65964, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0004-3651-7922
Sadeem AlqahtaniDepartment of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 62217, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0003-9316-7319
Razan KalantanDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22230, Saudi Arabia.
Raghad AlthomaliDepartment of Medicine, Taif University, Taif 26311, Saudi Arabia.
Maram AlameenDepartment of Medicine, Taif University, Taif 26311, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0005-5962-1746
Ahdab MuftiDepartment of Medicine, Ibn Sina National College, Jeddah 22230, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz University · SAQassim University · SATaif University · SAAl Baha University · SAAlfaisal University · SAGdańsk Medical University · PLIbn Sina National College for Medical Studies · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing Fahd Medical City · SAKing Khalid University · SANorthern Border University · SAUniversity of Tabuk · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Lung cancer's high mortality due to late diagnosis highlights a need for early detection strategies. Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly for lung cancer, offers promise by analyzing medical data for early identification and personalized treatment. This systematic review evaluates AI's performance in early lung cancer detection, analyzing its techniques, strengths, limitations, and comparative edge over traditional methods. (2) Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines rigorously, outlining a comprehensive protocol and employing tailored search strategies across diverse databases. Two reviewers independently screened studies based on predefined criteria, ensuring the selection of high-quality data relevant to AI's role in lung cancer detection. The extraction of key study details and performance metrics, followed by quality assessment, facilitated a robust analysis using R software (Version 4.3.0). The process, depicted via a PRISMA flow diagram, allowed for the meticulous evaluation and synthesis of the findings in this review. (3) Results: From 1024 records, 39 studies met the inclusion criteria, showcasing diverse AI model applications for lung cancer detection, emphasizing varying strengths among the studies. These findings underscore AI's potential for early lung cancer diagnosis but highlight the need for standardization amidst study variations. The results demonstrate promising pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.87, signifying AI's accuracy in identifying true positives and negatives, despite the observed heterogeneity attributed to diverse study parameters. (4) Conclusions: AI demonstrates promise in early lung cancer detection, showing high accuracy levels in this systematic review. However, study variations underline the need for standardized protocols to fully leverage AI's potential in revolutionizing early diagnosis, ultimately benefiting patients and healthcare professionals. As the field progresses, validated AI models from large-scale perspective studies will greatly benefit clinical practice and patient care in the future.

Indexed as

AI-driven modelsdiagnosinglung cancermeta-analysisoutcomespredictingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38339425
PMCPMC10854661
OpenAlexW4391576511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.