Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339376›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

A Novel Polymer-Encapsulated Multi-Imaging Modality Fiducial Marker with Positive Signal Contrast for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy.

Li Wang, Jeremiah Sanders, John F Ward, Stephen R Lee, Falk Poenisch, David Michael Swanson, Narayan Sahoo, Xiaorong Ronald Zhu, Jingfei Ma, Rajat J Kudchadker and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Universal Fiducial Markers for Multi-Modal Radiotherapy.International journal of particle therapy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li WangDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jeremiah SandersDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5342-4128
John F WardDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6027-8774
Stephen R LeeDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Falk PoenischDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
David Michael SwansonDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Narayan SahooDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Xiaorong Ronald ZhuDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jingfei MaDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2827-8891
Rajat J KudchadkerDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Seungtaek L ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Quynh-Nhu NguyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Lauren L MayoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Shalin J ShahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Steven J FrankDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent fiducial markers (FMs) in external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) cannot be positively visualized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and create dose perturbation and significant imaging artifacts on computed tomography (CT) and MRI. We report our initial experience with clinical imaging of a novel multimodality FM, NOVA.

methodsWe tested Gold Anchor [G-FM], BiomarC [carbon, C-FM], and NOVA FMs in phantoms imaged with kilovoltage (kV) X-rays, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), CT, and MRI. Artifacts of the FMs on CT were quantified by the relative streak artifacts level (rSAL) metric. Proton dose perturbations (PDPs) were measured with Gafchromic EBT3 film, with FMs oriented either perpendicular to or parallel with the beam axis. We also tested the performance of NOVA-FMs in a patient.

resultsNOVA-FMs were positively visualized on all 4 imaging modalities tested. The rSAL on CT was 0.750 ± 0.335 for 2-mm reconstructed slices. In F-tests, PDP was associated with marker type and depth of measurement (

conclusionsNOVA-FMs were positively visible and produced less PDP than G-FMs or C-FMs. NOVA-FMs facilitated MRI/CT fusion and identification of regions of interest.

Indexed as

fiducial markermagnetic resonance imagingNOVAprostate cancerradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID38339376
PMCPMC10854757
OpenAlexW4391403866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.