Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339359›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

How Did Breast Cancer Patients Fare during Different Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Norway Compared to Age-Matched Controls?

Karianne Svendsen, Sigrid Leithe, Cassia B Trewin-Nybråten, Aina Balto, Lise Solberg Nes, Anders Meland, Elin Børøsund, Cecilie E Kiserud, Kristin Valborg Reinertsen, Hege R Eriksen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. User profiles of young breast cancer survivors on Chinese social media: machine learning-based text mining analysis study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Karianne SvendsenCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0379 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7628-0999
Sigrid LeitheCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0379 Oslo, Norway.
Cassia B Trewin-NybråtenCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0379 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8236-9423
Aina BaltoCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0379 Oslo, Norway.
Lise Solberg NesDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0586 Oslo, Norway.
Anders MelandDepartment of Social Sciences, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 0863 Oslo, Norway.
Elin BørøsundDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0586 Oslo, Norway.
Cecilie E KiserudDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0310 Oslo, Norway.
Kristin Valborg ReinertsenDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0310 Oslo, Norway.
Hege R EriksenDepartment of Sport, Food and Natural Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9812-4463
Ylva Maria GjelsvikCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0379 Oslo, Norway.
Giske UrsinCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0379 Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NONorwegian School of Sport Sciences · NOUniversity of Southern California · USWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

Norwegian Cancer Society and Norwegian Breast Cancer Society 197409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about how health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in breast cancer cases differed from that of controls during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study used data from an ongoing, nationwide HRQoL survey of 4279 newly diagnosed breast cancer cases and 2911 controls to investigate how breast cancer patients fared during different phases of the pandemic compared to controls. Responders during 2020-2022 were categorized into three COVID-19-related phases: the social restrictions phase, the high infection rate phase, and the post-pandemic phase. Across phases, breast cancer cases had significantly worse scores in most HRQoL domains compared to controls. Apart from slightly more insomnia in the high infection rate phase for both cases and controls, and better social functioning for young cases in the post-COVID-19 phase, the case-control differences in HRQoL remained consistent across phases. When the phases were assessed as one period, young women and those living with children <18 years of age fared the worst among breast cancer cases, while single women fared the worst among controls. In contrast, controls living with children <18 years of age exhibited better HRQoL than controls without children. In summary, women with breast cancer did not appear to fare differently than controls in terms of HRQoL across COVID-19 phases. However, breast cancer cases with young children fared worse in their HRQoL than other breast cancer cases.

Indexed as

breast cancerCOVID-19EORTCfamilyHRQoL

Identifiers

PMID38339359
PMCPMC10854821
OpenAlexW4391404000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.