ReviewCancers2024
A Systematic Review on Artificial Intelligence Evaluating Metastatic Prostatic Cancer and Lymph Nodes on PSMA PET Scans.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic factors of PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Revolutionizing cancer diagnosis and dose biodistribution: a meta-analysis of [68ga] FAPI- 46 vs. [18f] FDG imaging.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Deep Learning Based Computer-Aided Detection of Prostate Cancer Metastases in Bone Scintigraphy: An Experimental Analysis.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Staging Prostate Cancer with AI: A Comparative Study of Large Language Models and Expert Interpretation on PSMA PET-CT Reports.Molecular imaging and biology · 2026Article
- Next-generation imaging in prostate cancer.Frontiers in urology · 2026Review
- Context-level machine learning to improve the identification of lymph node and bone metastases in prostate cancer patients using [EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- A fully automated AI-based method for tumour detection and quantification on [EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer diagnosis: current applications and future directions.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Predicting Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Post-Prostatectomy Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Editorial: PET/CT and MRI in prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Outsmarting Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Integration of Imaging, Liquid Biopsies and Biomarkers With Artificial Intelligence.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) is crucial. Whilst the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET scan has high diagnostic accuracy, it suffers from inter-reader variability, and the time-consuming reporting process. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42023456044) and aims to evaluate AI's ability to enhance reporting, diagnostics, and predictive capabilities for mPCa on PSMA PET scans. Inclusion criteria covered studies using AI to evaluate mPCa on PSMA PET, excluding non-PSMA tracers. A search was conducted on Medline, Embase, and Scopus from inception to July 2023. After screening 249 studies, 11 remained eligible for inclusion. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, meta-analysis was precluded. The prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) indicated a low overall risk of bias in ten studies, though only one incorporated clinical parameters (such as age, and Gleason score). AI demonstrated a high accuracy (98%) in identifying lymph node involvement and metastatic disease, albeit with sensitivity variation (62-97%). Advantages included distinguishing bone lesions, estimating tumour burden, predicting treatment response, and automating tasks accurately. In conclusion, AI showcases promising capabilities in enhancing the diagnostic potential of PSMA PET scans for mPCa, addressing current limitations in efficiency and variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.