Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339204›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Zebrafish Insights into Nanomaterial Toxicity: A Focused Exploration on Metallic, Metal Oxide, Semiconductor, and Mixed-Metal Nanoparticles.

Chinmaya Mutalik, Nivedita, Chandrasekaran Sneka, Dyah Ika Krisnawati, Sibidou Yougbaré, Chuan-Chih Hsu, Tsung-Rong Kuo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mechanistic paradigms of teratogenicity induced by metallic nanoparticles-a mini review.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Greener synthesis of silver nanoparticles fromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Nanotechnology and Agricultural Sustainability: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Enhancing Transcutaneous Drug Delivery: Advanced Perspectives on Skin Models.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
    Review
  16. Nanotoxicology: developments and new insights.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Chinmaya MutalikGraduate Institute of Nanomedicine and Medical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5548-2260
NiveditaInternational Ph.D. Program in Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Chandrasekaran SnekaInternational Ph.D. Program in Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Dyah Ika KrisnawatiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Surabaya 60237, East Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-1707-5191
Sibidou YougbaréInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de La Santé/Direction Régionale du Centre Ouest (IRSS/DRCO), Nanoro BP 218, 11, Burkina Faso.
Chuan-Chih HsuDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Tsung-Rong KuoGraduate Institute of Nanomedicine and Medical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4937-951X
Taipei Medical University · TWInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia · ID

Funding

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan NSTC 112-2113-M-038-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomaterials are widely used in various fields, and ongoing research is focused on developing safe and sustainable nanomaterials. Using zebrafish as a model organism for studying the potentially toxic effects of nanomaterials highlights the importance of developing safe and sustainable nanomaterials. Studies conducted on nanomaterials and their toxicity and potential risks to human and environmental health are vital in biomedical sciences. In the present review, we discuss the potential toxicity of nanomaterials (inorganic and organic) and exposure risks based on size, shape, and concentration. The review further explores various types of nanomaterials and their impacts on zebrafish at different levels, indicating that exposure to nanomaterials can lead to developmental defects, changes in gene expressions, and various toxicities. The review also covers the importance of considering natural organic matter and chorion membranes in standardized nanotoxicity testing. While some nanomaterials are biologically compatible, metal and semiconductor nanomaterials that enter the water environment can increase toxicity to aquatic creatures and can potentially accumulate in the human body. Further investigations are necessary to assess the safety of nanomaterials and their impacts on the environment and human health.

Indexed as

Metal NanoparticlesNanostructuresAnimalsHumansOxidesSemiconductorsZebrafishOxidesmetalnanomaterialROSsemiconductortoxicologyzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID38339204
PMCPMC10856345
OpenAlexW4391540162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.